Re: portability and small glitch in predicates
- From: marcomaggi <mrc.mgg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 14, 4:36 am, Abdulaziz Ghuloum <aghul...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
marcomaggi wrote:
In my reorganisation of the strings library from the SRFI
[...]
The string= comparison function is defined as:
Where did you get the definition from? I can't find it in
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-13/srfi-13.html#string=
(Self slap in the face.) You are right. Months ago I extended the
documentation because my library is incompatible with the SRFI; I
fully documented the return value because I though it could be useful.
Then I forgot it!
.
- References:
- portability and small glitch in predicates
- From: marcomaggi
- Re: portability and small glitch in predicates
- From: Abdulaziz Ghuloum
- portability and small glitch in predicates
- Prev by Date: Re: Bringing Scheme to the iPhone
- Next by Date: Re: Bringing Scheme to the iPhone
- Previous by thread: Re: portability and small glitch in predicates
- Next by thread: scheme to ruby translator?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|