Re: What's special about Lisp, in practice
- From: Lauri Alanko <la@xxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Jan 2006 09:51:11 GMT
In article <878xtfurbw.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Pascal Bourguignon <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In statically typed languages, either you must use template which
> duplicate the same code for each expected type, or you use
> type-casting to store in variables of one type values of another,
> which prevent the compiler to do strong type checking.
Duplicate? Template? That's _rather_ unfair. It almost sounds like you
are equating parametric polymorphism with the way it is implemented in
C++.
Lauri
.
- References:
- What's special about Lisp, in practice
- From: bobueland
- Re: What's special about Lisp, in practice
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- What's special about Lisp, in practice
- Prev by Date: Re: What's special about Lisp, in practice
- Next by Date: Re: What's special about Lisp, in practice
- Previous by thread: Re: What's special about Lisp, in practice
- Next by thread: Re: What's special about Lisp, in practice
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
