Re: Is everything object ?
- From: Duke Normandin <dukeofperl@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:48:13 -0500
On Sun, 1 May 2011, Michael Sokol wrote:
I like Chad's explanation.
I'd like to add that by definition, an object is a state and a
behavior. In the case of a method object, it surely has a behavior,
but I would question its state.
I've dabbled with Smalltalk and Self, and so his explanations of the
way Ruby operates remind me _a lot_ of how the former languages work.
--
Duke
.
- References:
- Re: Is everything object ?
- From: Josh Cheek
- Re: Is everything object ?
- From: Josh Cheek
- Re: Is everything object ?
- From: Josh Cheek
- Re: Is everything object ?
- From: Josh Cheek
- Re: Is everything object ?
- From: Josh Cheek
- Re: Is everything object ?
- From: Michael Sokol
- Re: Is everything object ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is everything object ?
- Next by Date: Re: Stanfordparser (or rjb) error on Snow Leopard
- Previous by thread: Re: Is everything object ?
- Next by thread: Re: Is everything object ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|