Re: Why Ruby?



[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Of course ten years ago Mike could easily have been asking:

On Dec 30, 1998, at 2:44 AM, Mike Stephens wrote:
I have never seen or heard of Java in a corporate context. The single
exception (where I first came across it) was a supplier using a Java
applet
to animate text on his world wide web page.

If you supply services to corporates, what sort of case can you make
for
using Java rather than C++, which is in use everywhere? (I'm not
thinking of applets here, which is a rat



The point being that the same patterns of behavior will recur.
So soon enough BigWig A will be playing gold with BigWig B
and will say,
"You know we've got some great cost savings with
our push to Agile, especially the whole Ruby on Rails things,
what about you?
"Us, we're looking at at it, not sure what results yet."

Next Morning
"Smith, What are doing with Ruby on Rails?"
"er um, dont know"
"Well I don't want to miss the boat on this thing, make sure we're
taking it seriously, lets raise it at the next development managers
meeting ..."

I can recall how hard it was to get people to take Java seriously.
I can also remember hearing "C++ is very pretty but it will never
replace Fortran"
And also, "You're trying to do that in GW-Basic. Are you crazy?
Everyone knows that you can only do FFTs in Assembler. It will never
be fast enough on an interpreter!"


On Dec 30, 2008, at 2:44 AM, Mike Stephens wrote:

I have never seen or heard of Ruby in a corporate context. The single
exception (where I first came across it) was a supplier who was
using it
with Watir for testing a Java application.

If you supply services to corporates, what sort of case can you make
for
using Ruby rather than Java, which is in use everywhere? (I'm not
thinking of Rails here, which is a rather specialized).
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.



.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Miscellanous Language Ranting (was Re: For performance, write it in C - Part 2, comparing C,
    ... I don't have to unlearn the parts of Perl that are common to Ruby. ... many people being attracted first to it then, by way of Rails, to Ruby ... marketing Java has received, rather than because Java was the Right Tool ... I think Java was chosen for its portability and for its convenient GUI. ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)
  • Re: Joel Spolsky on languages for web programming
    ... Actually, despite the fact that I love Ruby a lot, I'm inclined to ... applications geared for use by only a few people (internal client use ... application based on Rails. ... Java and C# are no guarantee for success. ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)
  • Re: Rubys not ready - an indepth essay
    ... | Sun benefits when the Java runtime is distributed. ... They see the benefit of Rails ... there are fewer good Ruby ... Sun brought the JRuby project into its fold Java fold after it had ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)
  • Enterprise Ruby Conference
    ... Many of you out there have stood back and watched as Ruby and Ruby on ... Rails have gained popularity. ... We have gathered an exceptional group of speakers to come and share ... experience and success in many environments such as Java and .NET. ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)
  • Re: How do we get there from here?
    ... and ruby on rails as well as ... Java with struts and Java Server Faces and plenty of others. ... eliminated Ruby and Python for now), but on the front end, I'm jumping ... into AJAX and not looking back. ...
    (comp.databases.pick)