Re: Concurent (using threads) slower than sequential -doubt
- From: Carlos Ortega <caof2005@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 22:25:52 -0500
Erik Veenstra wrote:
[2] ...if you're on a multicore machine. Oops. Will be fixed in
the next release.
It's released...
gegroet,
Erik V.
Thank you Erik and Robert...
I will try on both environments.
Regards
Carlos
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
.
- References:
- Concurent (using threads) slower than sequential -doubt
- From: Carlos Ortega
- Re: Concurent (using threads) slower than sequential -doubt
- From: Erik Veenstra
- Re: Concurent (using threads) slower than sequential -doubt
- From: Erik Veenstra
- Concurent (using threads) slower than sequential -doubt
- Prev by Date: Re: Ruby lacks atfork : The evil that lives in fork...
- Next by Date: Re: Problem with comparing huge amount of strings
- Previous by thread: Re: Concurent (using threads) slower than sequential -doubt
- Next by thread: Re: Concurent (using threads) slower than sequential -doubt
- Index(es):
