Re: Revision control for Ruby
- From: Joe Wölfel <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:23:35 -0500
Depending how you work I think safety and productivity improvements
can be large with many of the newer systems. There are several that
are worth a look. I've used Mercurial a little in the past and liked
it. I also use Bazaar a lot and find it easy to use and very
powerful. Probably the biggest issue I have with Bazaar is that a
plugin is required to use external diff tools. It's no big deal, but
that probably ought to be standard. I'm wondering if git is gaining
the most momentum in the Ruby community. Maybe that matters. On
Windows git might still depend on Cygwin, although I've heard this
might not be true anymore. All of these tools offer large
improvements over Subversion and CVS. I would avoid older designs
like those used in Subversion and CVS.
On 30 sept. 08, at 04:59, Ollivier Robert wrote:
In article <48e1e2a3$0$6620$9b4e6d93@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<twinandi@xxxxxx> wrote:
I love Mercurial (http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/). It's
distributed,
really fast and available for Linux MAC OS X AND Windows (contrary
to Git).
Via TortoiseHg it gets integrated into Windows File-Explorer (like
TortoiseSVN).
And it is nicely integrated in things like Redmine and Trac as
development
platforms.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- EUROCONTROL/CND/VIF/SEU -=-
Systems Engineering Unit
.
- References:
- Revision control for Ruby
- From: thiagobrandam
- Re: Revision control for Ruby
- From: twinandi
- Re: Revision control for Ruby
- From: Ollivier Robert
- Revision control for Ruby
- Prev by Date: Re: SPAM
- Next by Date: Re: Real world ruby programs to learn from
- Previous by thread: Re: Revision control for Ruby
- Next by thread: Re: Revision control for Ruby
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
