Re: Threads and Ruby
- From: Zhukov Pavel <gelios@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:28:57 -0500
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
<charles.nutter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
ara.t.howard wrote:Ruby doesn't have _real_ threads AFAIK, so DRb+fork it's the only way
for any situation you want processes. use fork or systemu if you want it
portable. threads are not the way to get a sandbox.
I hope you mean "for this situation". Processes are definitely not the
solution to all problems.
- Charlie
to get true parallel work.
.
- References:
- Threads and Ruby
- From: barjunk
- Re: Threads and Ruby
- From: ara.t.howard
- Re: Threads and Ruby
- From: Charles Oliver Nutter
- Threads and Ruby
- Prev by Date: Re: Threads and Ruby
- Next by Date: Re: Sleep in a multithreaded environment
- Previous by thread: Re: Threads and Ruby
- Next by thread: Re: Threads and Ruby
- Index(es):