Re: a = Dog.new # a is not a pointer and not a reference?
- From: SpringFlowers AutumnMoon <summercoolness@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 02:26:19 +0900
7stud -- wrote:
Austin Ziegler wrote:
I've seen you ask similar questions on three threads and you're no
closer to understanding
What makes you think that is the op's goal?
I asked similar question before although at that time I didn't know the
word reference can mean "alias that can't change where it points to" in
C++ and the general CS field. the word we in use in Ruby is also
reference. so trying to clarify how it relates to the rest of the
world.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
.
- References:
- a = Dog.new # a is not a pointer and not a reference?
- From: SpringFlowers AutumnMoon
- Re: a = Dog.new # a is not a pointer and not a reference?
- From: Morton Goldberg
- Re: a = Dog.new # a is not a pointer and not a reference?
- From: Austin Ziegler
- Re: a = Dog.new # a is not a pointer and not a reference?
- From: SpringFlowers AutumnMoon
- a = Dog.new # a is not a pointer and not a reference?
- Prev by Date: Re: Subclassing Thread?
- Next by Date: Re: [QUIZ] Probable Iterations (#141)
- Previous by thread: Re: a = Dog.new # a is not a pointer and not a reference?
- Next by thread: Re: a = Dog.new # a is not a pointer and not a reference?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|