Re: rubygame


On Aug 30, 2007, at 8:06 PM, Bill Kelly wrote:

From: "John Joyce" <dangerwillrobinsondanger@xxxxxxxxx>

Gosu was a lot easier to install, even though it's documentation consists of a single tutorial and features are either limited or just undocumented. Fairly intuitive, yet still hard to do a lot with at this point.

I have not yet tried Gosu myself; but just out of curiosity,
what sorts of things did you find hard to do with it?

hmm. Beyond the tutorial? more than fiddling with the tutorial? Couldn't do much. Maybe I'm missing something.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [opensuse] Bye bye SuSE?
    ... Actually, when I wrote that, I did not even know how to edit a wiki ... they've handled tens of "missing in KDE4" bug ... of us don't know what features may be missing since KDE4 apparently has so ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
    ... you are missing a lot actually. ... >> Anything wrong with the original Caret Management? ... > -no block selection features like comment/uncomment, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: iphone features
    ... damn, the iphone obviously has some cool features, but it's seriously missing some features! ... 1- no voice dialing on a phone w/ no tactile feedback? ... with all the hype, the iphone is practically guranteed to be successful, but damn, it sure seems to have some serious shortcomings... ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Building my own valve amp
    ... There absolutely has to be a missing piece to this jigsaw. ... different brains prioritise different key features. ... upwards of 5 grand or so on a big, fat SS amp you might just be able to ...
    (uk.rec.audio)
  • Re: Variable not Showing in Debugger
    ... I just thought that the debugger could show everything that's happening in the code as you step through. ... If the Express version had all of the features that the retail versions had, there wouldn't be much point in the retail versions, would there? ... That is, obviously given that some features are missing in the Express version, some of the missing features would be ones that are useful for learning. ... In other words, I have no idea why you would expect that the free version of Visual Studio be every bit as effective a "learning tool" as the retail version, at least with respect to your apparent implication that features in the IDE equate to it being a "learning tool". ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)