Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML

On 8/1/07, Phlip <phlip2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Robert Dober wrote:

I however ask myself if this is the style we normally apply?
I agree with Philip that if we cannot discuss our code we will never
provide anything useful...

Dude, I was stuck on your exact problem just before you posted.

A high-volume forum generates a crew of regulars who tend to get
trigger-happy about FAQs and such. Try policing a group yourself to
see how easy and fun it is!

Philip I am losing you here, what are you talking about? I guess this
thread is dead now, but I am still here to discuss RDoc if someone has
to say something about here.

Cheers
Robert

--
[...] as simple as possible, but no simpler.
-- Attributed to Albert Einstein

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
    ... I agree with Philip that if we cannot discuss our code we will never ... Dude, I was stuck on your exact problem just before you posted. ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)
  • Re: Outgoing SMTP problems!
    ... Still stuck on this. ... Even attempted to change delivery,method from dns to ... via isp's mail server all to no avail. ... "Philip Chen" wrote: ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Stock monitoring work sheet.
    ... Philip ... > Bit stuck here wondered if anyone can help? ... > After entering the name it can be deleted from the single cell at the ... > to have to stray into the world of macros? ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions)