Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
- From: Phlip <phlip2005@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:40:24 +0900
Robert Dober wrote:
I however ask myself if this is the style we normally apply?
I agree with Philip that if we cannot discuss our code we will never
provide anything useful...
Dude, I was stuck on your exact problem just before you posted.
A high-volume forum generates a crew of regulars who tend to get
trigger-happy about FAQs and such. Try policing a group yourself to
see how easy and fun it is!
--
Phlip
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/9780596510657/
^ assert_xpath
http://tinyurl.com/yrc77g <-- assert_latest Model
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
- From: Robert Dober
- Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
- References:
- Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
- From: Phlip
- Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
- Prev by Date: Re: From ncurse to Ruby
- Next by Date: Re: TK for web application
- Previous by thread: Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
- Next by thread: Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|