Re: is it bug? for
- From: "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 23:38:41 +0900
On 6/30/07, Axel Etzold <AEtzold@xxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Gregory,
> I can only assume so seeing as this is the behaviour of String#to_a in
> 1.8 and it does not exist in 1.9
>
> But no, he'd need to answer that. Typically if you want to do that
> kind of manipulation, Array() is better, anyhow.
>
> >> Array([1,2,3])
> => [1, 2, 3]
> >> Array("foo")
> => ["foo"]
Well thank you. I was just writing because I feel you should be
careful before you start hurling "rubbish" at other people - maybe
in the context they wanted, something else might be more appropriate ...
e.g., if you create word lists from texts, as I had to lately quite
a lot.
I wasn't the one who said Rubbish, actually. That was Bertram.
(Which I thought was rude, too)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: is it bug? for
- From: Axel Etzold
- Re: is it bug? for
- References:
- is it bug? for
- From: Chung Chung
- Re: is it bug? for
- From: Axel Etzold
- Re: is it bug? for
- From: Bertram Scharpf
- Re: is it bug? for
- From: Axel Etzold
- Re: is it bug? for
- From: Gregory Brown
- Re: is it bug? for
- From: Axel Etzold
- Re: is it bug? for
- From: Gregory Brown
- Re: is it bug? for
- From: Axel Etzold
- is it bug? for
- Prev by Date: Re: patten match
- Next by Date: Re: is it bug? for
- Previous by thread: Re: is it bug? for
- Next by thread: Re: is it bug? for
- Index(es):