Re: Lightweight Ruby?
- From: Ilan Berci <coder68@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:59:40 +0900
Cganon,
I don't believe it's a matter of being light, it's simply a matter of
security. Embedded scripting engines within games must heavily limit a
language's capabilities to avoid malicious intent. Lua for example, used
within WoW, is very primitive by design.
There are examples of this in the Java community as well. RoboCode,
written within IBM and now open source uses Java's security manager to
restrict callers from creating threads or getting access to system
resources.
I believe that it would be incredibly complex to implenent safe guards
in an open class system but hopefully I am terribly misguided. :)
ilan
Chanon Sajjamanochai wrote:
Hi all,
But I really like the Ruby language/syntax .. I just wish there was a
more
lightweight version of it that is more portable. Heavy features such as
threads wouldn't be required so that it could be more lightweight.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lightweight Ruby?
- From: Kero
- Re: Lightweight Ruby?
- References:
- Lightweight Ruby?
- From: Chanon Sajjamanochai
- Lightweight Ruby?
- Prev by Date: Re: Hash#each
- Next by Date: Re: Dr Nic’s Magic Models
- Previous by thread: Re: Lightweight Ruby?
- Next by thread: Re: Lightweight Ruby?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|