Re: Removing a single level of array nesting.
Kenosis <kenosis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Robert - that's what I thought too but my test in irb failed.
Must be that I have to use *array when passing it to GetopLong.
That's what I was insinuating. :-)
robert
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Removing a single level of array nesting.
... Thanks Robert - that's what I thought too but my test in irb failed. ... Must be that I have to use *array when passing it to GetopLong. ...
(comp.lang.ruby) - Re: Receiving array naturally?
... def simple ... It's also possible to use * when passing the array to the method, ...
(comp.lang.ruby) - Re: improving my code: array of references
... are you assigning its return value to the scalar passed as a parameter? ... I think the issue is what you mean by "modifies". ... Either you should be using a array from the beginning, ... big I am going to be passing around lots of data. ...
(perl.beginners) - Re: 3rd and Final Post OCX Design Question
... whether there would be any difference in speed hit by creating the array on ... the client and passing a reference to the array or passing the picture and ... >> What is the difference between passing a picture as IPictureDisp as ... > the reference to the object. ...
(microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion) - Re: Proper use of delegates.
... the compiler will do it for you as long what you're passing doesn't look like an objectto the compiler. ... But any time you don't need to pass an array of parameters, yes...you could explicitly do the cast just to make sure that the overload you want is the one that's actually used. ... Then, what you're passing is always an object, with some number of elements equal to the number of parameters for the method. ...
(microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp) |
|
