Re: IBM vs. Microsoft vs. ... Ruby?
- From: Pascal Meunier <pmeunier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:43:43 +0900
How about:
-some way to configure mod-ruby so you don't have to restart Apache every
time you change a class.
-having script behavior parity between mod-ruby and the command-line Ruby
1.8.2. (load and require behavior, and access to warnings like those you get
with the w option)
mod-ruby needs TLC.
On 9/29/05 6:21 PM, "bonefry" <bellarchitects@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are 2 important things missing from Ruby right now: a fast VM and
> a good IDE. Until you have those you really cannot do "Enterprise
> Scale" applications.
> But maybe in the future.
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IBM vs. Microsoft vs. ... Ruby?
- From: David Heinemeier Hansson
- Re: IBM vs. Microsoft vs. ... Ruby?
- From: Jeff McNeil
- Re: IBM vs. Microsoft vs. ... Ruby?
- References:
- Re: IBM vs. Microsoft vs. ... Ruby?
- From: bonefry
- Re: IBM vs. Microsoft vs. ... Ruby?
- Prev by Date: Re: IBM vs. Microsoft vs. ... Ruby?
- Next by Date: Re: Operator Overloading <<
- Previous by thread: Re: IBM vs. Microsoft vs. ... Ruby?
- Next by thread: Re: IBM vs. Microsoft vs. ... Ruby?
- Index(es):