Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- From: "Jason Voegele" <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:09:07 +0900
On Sat, September 17, 2005 4:15 pm, Randy Kramer said:
> On Saturday 17 September 2005 05:51 am, Robert Klemme wrote:
>> First of all it's five philosophers (i.e. as far as I remeber it's
>> important that the number of resource aquisitors is odd).
[snip]
> Just replying for "fun", iirc, when I went to school it didn't make any
> difference whether the number was odd or even--there was one fork for each
> philosopher but he could only eat if he had two forks. (Sounds odd, now.)
When I first learned of the Dining Philosophers, they used chopsticks so
it made sense that they would need two in order to eat.
--
Jason Voegele
"There is an essential core at the center of each man and woman that
remains unaltered no matter how life's externals may be transformed
or recombined. But it's smaller than we think."
-- Gene Wolfe, The Book of the Long Sun
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- From: Alex Nedelcu
- Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- From: Randy Kramer
- Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- References:
- Some interesting criticisms of rails
- From: David Balick
- Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- From: Zed A. Shaw
- Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- From: Randy Kramer
- Some interesting criticisms of rails
- Prev by Date: Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- Next by Date: Re: you can't get in trouble with your boss for picking C#
- Previous by thread: Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- Next by thread: Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|