Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- From: Douglas Livingstone <rampant@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:32:29 +0900
2005/9/17, Robert Klemme <bob.news@xxxxxxx>:
>
> First of all it's five philosophers (i.e. as far as I remeber it's important
> that the number of resource aquisitors is odd).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dining_philosophers_problem
Not only five philosophers, but five forks too.
The solutions here are very much about moving the complexity out of
the application and into the database, which is fine if your database
can handle it. It doesn't *remove* the complexity as such, it just
means that you can stop worrying about it until your database servers
die, which in your average web app probably won't happen.
Douglas
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- From: Alex Nedelcu
- Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- References:
- Some interesting criticisms of rails
- From: David Balick
- Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- From: Zed A. Shaw
- Some interesting criticisms of rails
- Prev by Date: Re: gsub(/Ads by Goooooogle/, "PayPal DONATE").suggest?
- Next by Date: Re: acgi-0.1.0
- Previous by thread: Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- Next by thread: Re: Some interesting criticisms of rails
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
