Re: SWIG Ruby Memory Management
- From: "Lipper, Matthew" <Mlipper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 04:51:33 +0900
>
> Lipper, Matthew wrote:
> >> Charlie Savage schrieb:
> >>> ...
> >>> As can be seen in the code below, I have gone down the
> >> hashtable route
> >>> with a slight twist - I use a Ruby hash table from C to
> store these
> >>> mappings. I did this instead of using a C++ map since I
> >> wanted to the
> >>> code to be just C and it was easier then implementing a
> hash table
> >>> from scratch in C.
> >>> ...
> >> I can't say anything about your code, cause I've never
> used SWIG yet,
> >> but it looks like you've done a very nice work.
> >
> > Ditto.
> >
> >> I just wanted to mention a hash table implementation in C which is
> >> used in the Ruby source code:
> >> just look at st.[hc].
> >>
> >> Regards, Pit
> >>
> >>
> >
> > You mentioned you were writing a Ruby binding for GDAL. Are
> you going
> > to make this publicly available?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> Yes, the bindings will be part of the GDAL release (and are
> in CVS now - although what is checked in is slightly out of
> date). Right now there are a few people working on bindings
> for languages other than Python - I just picked up the Ruby
> one since I needed it.
>
> Charlie
>
Cool, thanks!
Regards,
Matt
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Dude, where's my carriage returns?
- Next by Date: Re: AIX and Ruby issues (still)
- Previous by thread: Re: SWIG Ruby Memory Management
- Next by thread: [ANN] Mockery initial release (yet another dynamic mock object generator)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|