Re: Rails the daemon side of things
- From: BearItAll <bearitall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:42:48 +0100
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 03:15:16 +0900, Ben Giddings wrote:
> On Monday 15 August 2005 12:01, BearItAll wrote:
>> Anyway I got web space on an ISP that supports ruby rails, the big
>> difference is that on my local server I ran rails from the script
>>
>> script/server
>>
>> Then access with the likes of http://web:3000
>
> This is the "development mode" for rails, using the Ruby "Webrick" web
> server.
>
>> But ISP's being ISP's they don't actually tell you what changes you have
>> to make to the way you access your site or add to the available
>> applications.
>
> Hmm, odd. Most of the time they do. If they "support rails", then they
> probably have a certain setup for it. Most likely, they're probably
> either setting it up so you can run it with Apache/cgi or Apache/fcgi,
> maybe lighthttpd/fcgi.
I am certain that is what is wrong now, that my web server space
hasn't been properly set up. For example I can only open Rubyrail's
'Congratulations' page if I give the full path with file name index.html.
i.e. there are no default page names.
My host also seems to have a bit of a sense of humour, the script to
generate project spaces ( equivelent to 'rails projectname' ) gives the
project directory and all files below it 777 rights. Hows that for smart,
not.
Anyway I have written to them so should be able to get going properly soon.
.
- References:
- Rails the daemon side of things
- From: BearItAll
- Re: Rails the daemon side of things
- From: Ben Giddings
- Rails the daemon side of things
- Prev by Date: Re: Building a REPL for Ruby
- Next by Date: Re: Rails the daemon side of things
- Previous by thread: Re: Rails the daemon side of things
- Next by thread: Bug in cgi/session
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|