Re: [OT] Re: Next Official Ruby Version

Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> But even after the third look i don't like the syntax of Ocaml. I
> really don't like it.

Yeah, I'd love it if it looked more Haskellish, but syntax apart it
seems like a language well worth learning. Plus once I'm more proficient
I can always play around with the preprocessor and see what sort of DSL
support I can hack in.

martin
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: newbe about API
    ... sure...because the Intel encodings and prefixes for 16-bit and 32-bit ... know - from only looking at those instruction encodings - which way ... Hence, even with your great "size suffix" syntax, Intel's encodings ... But, yeah, I looked at your code, Herbert, and you employed something ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: "Syntax error in ALTER TABLE statement.", again...
    ... > Yeah, yeah, once again about this error... ... No matter the language used to send DDL commands to the db, ... syntax has to fit the db's DDL syntax. ... In Access (JET) dbs some ...
    (microsoft.public.access.queries)
  • Re: Adding functionality to ARM BASIC
    ... jgh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jonathan Graham Harston) wrote: ... Yeah, we've done this one. ... There really should be a syntax for it, ... Steve has suggested one. ...
    (comp.sys.acorn.programmer)
  • Re: XSLT not closing XHTML tags question
    ... Aplogies - i never read that far:) ... Anyway - yeah that is the right syntax. ... Just make sure you have the Dublin ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.xml)
  • Re: ruby wish-list
    ... Yeah my wish would be for a syntax that "makes sense" for deleting ... would act like delete. ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)
Loading