Re: Refactoring Tycho API - Opinions wanted

>> http://handhelds.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/rb-pim/
>
> You're eventually targeting the handheld? Coolness.

I was targeting the iPAQ before; but UI kept bothering me.
It's just that my contacts list need better maintainability and
flexibility that I picked up the topic again. and then you interfered
:)

>> app.find_note vs app.find_topic vs topic.find_note
>> this distinction necessary? isn't it 'just' an additional
>> lter? (you probably have a reason for this, I'd like to know)
>
> The distinction between notes and topics is necessary. Think of
> the Unix find, how it can do "-type d" or "-type f" for an analogy.

does it?
I'll accept it as classification; notes should be able to fit more than
one class/topic, I suppose?
(does this match the aspects from Clifford?)

>> Dunno whether I "get it". Part of it, at least :)
>
> The version on rubyforge *should* work -- it's just old and not full-
> featured by any means. But you can do searching and sorting and
> add/delete notes and such. And it comes with several hundred
> notes already -- all the 'ri' data, a snapshot of rubyforge, and the
> TOC
> for _The Ruby Way_. Also a few little demo notes.

trying to get foxruby working now...

>> See some 'find' CLI session example below.
>
> This is the sort of thing Tycho would be good for, *except* that you
> would either have to enter the addresses free-form or wait for some
> kind of "template" or "field-oriented" feature to be added (which is on
> my list).

some things are free form. I play a trick so address/code/city in a
Location are 'always there', but arbitrary key/value pairs can be added
(you have always funny info about some persons that won't be in any
fixed list of keys (attributes)).

PS: as coincidence, I saw "Lost in Translation" last Tuesday, which
features on one of your screenshots :)

+--- Kero ------------------------- kero@chello@nl ---+
| all the meaningless and empty words I spoke |
| Promises -- The Cranberries |
+--- M38c --- http://members.chello.nl/k.vangelder ---+
.

Relevant Pages

  • vs 2008 compiles 3.5 code regardless of target version
    ... Is it true that many of the 3.5 features will work even if ... you are targeting the .NET 2.0 framework? ... cause these to become compiler errors during development so you can ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Best one ?
    ... "best" is a subjective term. ... You might want to post the kind of features you ... are interested in and the price range you are targeting. ...
    (microsoft.public.pocketpc)
  • Re: Visual Studio 2008 released
    ... C# 3 features while targeting .NET 2.0. ... I don't suppose it's possible by manually editing the csproj file is ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Visual Studio 2008 released
    ... struggle. ... C# 3 features while targeting .NET 2.0. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)