Re: Fully parallel Scheme-based language w/ evaluator
- From: "Vzalamataz Portnoy" <nester@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:11:14 -0500
With a review of this material above, i can see that there is a chance that
he server I am using can perhaps be set up to use timestamping between some
of the network computers, while not using it between some other computers on
the network. The timestamping option is actually found to be an effective
way to allow a user to break into the stream and interrupt the dominant
server process. This is true even on a company LAN, where the connection is
fairly hard wired.
The servers and operating systems are already using parallelist technical
specifications. The point to working with parallelism is to get a grasp on
what you are doing when you are working under those systems, and avoiding
making then fail to perform by cutting too many corners.
If you code had a few more comments it might be a little easier to follow or
to correct.
"Eli Gottlieb" <eligottlieb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46c3a06b$0$31912$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Vzalamataz Portnoy wrote:
Eli Z. Gottlieb
.
- References:
- ANN: Fully parallel Scheme-based language w/ evaluator
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Re: Fully parallel Scheme-based language w/ evaluator
- From: Vzalamataz Portnoy
- Re: Fully parallel Scheme-based language w/ evaluator
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- ANN: Fully parallel Scheme-based language w/ evaluator
- Prev by Date: Re: Fully parallel Scheme-based language w/ evaluator
- Next by Date: gnu make problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Fully parallel Scheme-based language w/ evaluator
- Next by thread: Re: ANN: Fully parallel Scheme-based language w/ evaluator
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|