Re: [LogoForum] Further development on MSWLogo
- From: Clem Rutter <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:50:22 +0100
The message below is being cross-posted from LogoForum.
This is a fascinating thread- but I leave on a email vacation tomorrow!
Brian. PLM- I wish I had found it myself I would look less stupid. PLM was I thought a variant of PL/1 but I was not up on IBM speak we used to think that Atlas autocode would rule the earth and HBM was a latecomer- we were patriotic in Manchester. Wikipedia doesn't recognise PLM either- someone needs to write an entry.
The existance of PLM really helps to read the UCB code, I was being polite about lack of comment statements- I understand the philosophy and it works for core code.With my code I could make the same statement, but with my younger students I need every assistance to to unerstand what they meant. It is the IO routines, and the Windows bits that I find more difficult as logic 'as we know it' has to be abandonned when dealing with Redmondware , I would need them if I nried to port them to X and Linux/OS GUIs.
Daniel 8 bit does rule out East Asian languages which will need to be addressed. However, half is better than nothing, from my point of view everything I do should be acccessible in all EU states (including Poland with their difficult s ). that also includes Russian and Greek.
Gene. How also about a intelligent Logo that detects the language of the user from the source code. A child that types LINKS90 will be recognised as using German keywords, while one who types ESQUERDA90 will be using Portuguese. (I like the idea of Logo self correcting elementary mistakes DWIM)
David. No, not just Western European- Eastern European is required. Dates and times are very important- particular with youngsters the fourteens of July is 14.07.2005 in English lessons, in exercise books so 'why must we do it differently in Computing'. Another bugbear is where North American spelling diverges from European English. I always have to say "BGCOLOR- remember to include the deliberate spelling mistake". Both spellings of the keyword should be acceptable for important primitives. The other words that the English department has fought to teach is ' licence' the noun and 'to license' the verb there are a couple of others with this pattern, and finally 'internationalisation' jumps out of the page when it is written with a 'z'. All hard coded strings should be in a external table- it is an urban myth that german words are necessarily longer- as Abk.s (Abkurzungen) are perfectly akzeptabel (annehmbar). I have forgotten the French command set but believe it they use AV for forward, AR for back, TD and TG for turn Right and Left, as LOGO commands are traditionnnally done in uppercase accents are not a used. This will not apply in Polish, where I suspect accents will be needed. You dont translate the 700 page work of art, you allow each language to default to the English doc, if no local translation is found. As I said before, the first person to demand LOGO in a particular language will have to used LOGO in English first before (s)he could understand LOGO's advantages- they are thus the idea person to undertake the translation of the fixed text strings and primitives and to apply to their government for a grant to get it officially translated..
Control codes. Howabout Ctrl Y and Ctrl Z for Undo and Redo. Some folk may prefer other keyboard bindings - its not an issue for me. DWIM yes please, ideally I like to see fd100 changed on entering cr giving a audible sound, with experience users will automatically change to the correct syntax, when they internalise the concept of a keyword taking an argument/parameter.
If I can be of assistance in September, feel free to ask. Clem
LogoForum messages are archived at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LogoForum
.
- Prev by Date: Re: [LogoForum] Subject: Re: Further development on MSWLogo.
- Next by Date: Re: [LogoForum] Re: Further development on MSWLogo
- Previous by thread: Re: [LogoForum] Further development on MSWLogo
- Next by thread: Re: [LogoForum] "struct" type in Logo?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading