Re: FPGA question (UP Cast)...
- From: JoeLabView <x@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 07:40:30 -0500 (CDT)
Hi Helmut,
As I suspected, the elements of the reference clusters are somewhat different. It would be nice to see a probe on the broken wire (red-X).
The probes 2 & 6 match. The contain the Execution Reference and the Execution Target.
Why do you need the Connector Pane & the Front Panel controls as part of that cluster? Would it be possible to use the reference cluster without the "Generic Class Reference"? In other words, connect the output of the PXI-7831R directly to the output of the Case Statement? Since they match, that would resolve the broken wire. I simply do not know if you need to use the connecor pane & front panel controls. I doubt it ;)
Try removing the Generic Class Reference. For some reason, it appends the front panel & connector pane to the reference cluster as shown in the 2nd image (probes 3 & 7). I suspect the elements should be similar to probes 2 & 6. Well actually, I am more familiar with a single reference which in this case would be the Execution Reference (only), typically a blue-green wire.
The first step is to resolve the reference cluster mismatch. They must have the same number of elements and the same types at the same locations. Without seeing the complete diagram, I cannot recommend using the execution reference only.... but it might be worth a try.. ;)
I am curious at what are the elements of the cluster at the broken wire.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
JLV
.
- References:
- Re: FPGA question (UP Cast)...
- From: JoeLabView
- Re: FPGA question (UP Cast)...
- Prev by Date: Re: unflatten from string
- Next by Date: Re: LabVIEW RSLinx and DH485
- Previous by thread: Re: FPGA question (UP Cast)...
- Next by thread: Re: Is there a way to 'comment' out code?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|