Re: FAQ Topic - What does the future hold for ECMAScript? (2009-05-01)
- From: Dr J R Stockton <reply0918@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 21:19:02 +0100
In comp.lang.javascript message <49fa2d77$0$90276$14726298@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
dk>, Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:00:01, FAQ server <javascript@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
posted:
The ECMAScript Technical Committee is now working a new
edition. More information can be found at:
http://www.ecmascript.org/
I think it would be useful to say which Edition they are working on.
Those familiar with the 3rd/2nd may be looking forward to the 4th/3rd.
Actually, having released a Draft, the Committee would be wise to rest
until the closing date for responses. Mine has been sent, as a brief E-
mail citing <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-262-5.htm>.
The quoted sentence is not good English (needs "on"); it may be "good
American".
--
(c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links.
Proper <= 4-line sig. separator as above, a line exactly "-- " (SonOfRFC1036)
Do not Mail News to me. Before a reply, quote with ">" or "> " (SonOfRFC1036)
.
- References:
- FAQ Topic - What does the future hold for ECMAScript? (2009-05-01)
- From: FAQ server
- FAQ Topic - What does the future hold for ECMAScript? (2009-05-01)
- Prev by Date: Re: viewing the form variables that are being submitted
- Next by Date: Re: viewing the form variables that are being submitted
- Previous by thread: FAQ Topic - What does the future hold for ECMAScript? (2009-05-01)
- Next by thread: resizeTo not working in Opera 9.64
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
