Re: jQuery's latest stab at competence
- From: Jorge <jorge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:41:31 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 10, 11:31 am, David Mark <dmark.cins...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 10, 5:15 am, Jorge <jo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
you're missing the big picture.
The big picture being that a collection of general-purpose Javascript
could possibly aid in the development of Websites and Web
applications? No, I don't think I'm missing that.
Then instead of focusing your arguments on the low-level
implementation details, you ought to step back a little bit, and argue
against their APIs, their programming models, their concepts. Because
their source code keeps evolving and eventually you'll have nothing to
argue.
Arguments like "JQuery's 'chainability' isn't a nice thing because...
(whatever)" carry much more weight than that of "jquery.js line 1327
is poorly coded, see ?".
--
Jorge.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: jQuery's latest stab at competence
- From: David Mark
- Re: jQuery's latest stab at competence
- References:
- jQuery's latest stab at competence
- From: David Mark
- Re: jQuery's latest stab at competence
- From: Matt Kruse
- Re: jQuery's latest stab at competence
- From: Peter Michaux
- Re: jQuery's latest stab at competence
- From: David Mark
- Re: jQuery's latest stab at competence
- From: Peter Michaux
- Re: jQuery's latest stab at competence
- From: David Mark
- Re: jQuery's latest stab at competence
- From: Jorge
- Re: jQuery's latest stab at competence
- From: David Mark
- jQuery's latest stab at competence
- Prev by Date: packaging and namespacing in javascript
- Next by Date: Re: question on event call to an iframe in designMode (IE7)
- Previous by thread: Re: jQuery's latest stab at competence
- Next by thread: Re: jQuery's latest stab at competence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|