Re: Update location.hash without adding to history?
- From: David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:57:19 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 20, 9:48 pm, Mikey C <mebemik...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I understand in many cases, adding to history when updating
window.location.hash is a GOOD thing. In my case, I want to update
bookmarkability from javascript (post-load), but can't get it to do so
without adding a record to history. (Firefox 3.0.3)
That would be a silly thing to do.
I know it's possible to do, because Google is doing it. See this
There is confirmation.
URL:http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=mjvGTXgFl6cC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1...
Note, scrolling up and down changes the hash without adding history
entries.
That is not what the hash is for and there is little chance that
Google is doing anything right in their script.
Any idea how this is done? I have been looking for a solution for
months (on and off, but haven't found anything.)
You wasted those months. Now re-think your design.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Update location.hash without adding to history?
- From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
- Re: Update location.hash without adding to history?
- References:
- Update location.hash without adding to history?
- From: Mikey C
- Update location.hash without adding to history?
- Prev by Date: Update location.hash without adding to history?
- Next by Date: Re: Muuttujien leveydet C++:ssa?
- Previous by thread: Update location.hash without adding to history?
- Next by thread: Re: Update location.hash without adding to history?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|