Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: "Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn" <PointedEars@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
kangax wrote:
dhtml wrote:
isFunction - still uses function decompilation. Kangax posted on
es-discuss that that was changed but I still see the isFunction in the
latest 1.2.6.
Garrett,
their trunk is using `instanceof` [1].
Irrelevant, except that it shows their cluelessness.
PointedEars
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: Oltmans
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- References:
- Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: RobG
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: Joost Diepenmaat
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: RobG
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: dhtml
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: Conrad Lender
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: dhtml
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: kangax
- Is jQuery worth a second look?
- Prev by Date: Re: Tapestry template exception
- Next by Date: Re: Load Body html on button click.
- Previous by thread: Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- Next by thread: Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- Index(es):
