Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno.42.desthuilliers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:09:06 +0200
Henry a écrit :
On Sep 30, 6:23 am, kangax wrote:On Sep 30, 12:13 am, dhtml wrote:<snip><snip>isFunction - still uses function decompilation. KangaxGarrett,
posted on es-discuss that that was changed but I still
see the isFunction in the latest 1.2.6.
their trunk is using `instanceof` [1].
Unreleased development code is irrelevant.
I beg to somewhat disagree. It at least gives indications about the current direction.
(snip)
.
- References:
- Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: RobG
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: Joost Diepenmaat
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: RobG
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: dhtml
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: Conrad Lender
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: dhtml
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: kangax
- Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- From: Henry
- Is jQuery worth a second look?
- Prev by Date: Re: What's wrong with arguments.callee ?
- Next by Date: Re: Tapestry template exception
- Previous by thread: Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- Next by thread: Re: Is jQuery worth a second look?
- Index(es):