Re: simple variables as properties?
- From: Dr J R Stockton <jrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:54:28 +0100
In comp.lang.javascript message <c96a80e0-10d0-4d4f-9e6c-60139b328829@n3
8g2000prl.googlegroups.com>, Thu, 4 Sep 2008 03:34:08, Henry
<rcornford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted:
ECMA 262 (usually 3rd Ed (for now (3.1 is planed for next year))). No
other source is definitive.
Not so. ISO/IEC 16262 is superior.
--
(c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links.
Proper <= 4-line sig. separator as above, a line exactly "-- " (SonOfRFC1036)
Do not Mail News to me. Before a reply, quote with ">" or "> " (SonOfRFC1036)
.
- References:
- simple variables as properties?
- From: optimistx
- Re: simple variables as properties?
- From: optimistx
- Re: simple variables as properties?
- From: Henry
- Re: simple variables as properties?
- From: optimistx
- Re: simple variables as properties?
- From: Henry
- simple variables as properties?
- Prev by Date: Re: Abbreviating a statement
- Next by Date: Q: Create unUnload event trigger outside body tag?
- Previous by thread: Re: simple variables as properties?
- Next by thread: Re: Google anounces new (open source) browser with new JavaScript VM.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
