Re: dynamically generating html vs using html scaffolding?
- From: VK <schools_ring@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 15, 7:02 pm, Peter <peter.schille...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Websites / DOM based programs that run in a browser: 2 different
things!
Absolutely. By rephrasing it in the "commercial lingo": Web 1.0 and
Web 2.0 are two different things.
Web 1.0 one started and remains as information represented in a
particular format (HTML markup) delivered to a viewer able to render
such format (browser). In the context of Web 1.0 styling and scripting
are additional tools intended to facilitate the process of perceiving
and navigating withing the delivered information. At the same time
they are not required to use the delivered information.
Web 2.0 is a client-side interface to handle different information.
This interface is programmed using Javascript and DOM and usable over
capable framework application (browser). Other words Web 2.0 content
and a browser are in the same relations as Javascript and HTML page or
Java applet and JVM. This interface is not intended and doesn't have
to operate without a capable framework application, in the same way as
Java applet is not intended nor has to run without JVM installed.
Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 are _not_ in XOR relation. The one doesn't exclude
other nor one has to replace other (though it will most probably
happen in some amount of time).
It is just not appropriate to mechanically apply the same set of
demands to two completely different concepts - but many old thinkers
are still trying to do it, and not in this NG only.
.
- References:
- dynamically generating html vs using html scaffolding?
- From: Faisal Vali
- Re: dynamically generating html vs using html scaffolding?
- From: SAM
- Re: dynamically generating html vs using html scaffolding?
- From: Dan Rumney
- Re: dynamically generating html vs using html scaffolding?
- From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
- Re: dynamically generating html vs using html scaffolding?
- From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
- Re: dynamically generating html vs using html scaffolding?
- From: Peter
- dynamically generating html vs using html scaffolding?
- Prev by Date: Re: dynamically generating html vs using html scaffolding?
- Next by Date: Re: dynamically generating html vs using html scaffolding?
- Previous by thread: Re: dynamically generating html vs using html scaffolding?
- Next by thread: Re: dynamically generating html vs using html scaffolding?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|