Re: SV: How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- From: "K Viltersten" <tmp1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 11:34:30 +0200
Den 2008-05-23 11:17:11 skrev Tim Streater <tim.streater@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
In article <69mvq6F33o7alU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"K Viltersten" <tmp1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Where does this go in the next decade? If simple things are already
>>> being ladled as awe inspiring what superlatives are going to be left
>>> for the things that are really worth pointing out?
>>
>> I've checked Wikipedia for "universal judge of what's
>> simple thing" but sadly they haven't updated the database
>> with your name yet, so let's just say that what's "simple
>> thing" to you, perhaps is a new concept to someone else.
>>
>> I'm here to ask questions and learn. Not to get insulted!
>> I'm thankful for the advices and suggestions you (and
>> others) are offering but that doesn't entitle you to be
>> impolite or deminishing. I can be that too. I choose not
>> to and i'd appreciate if others could follow. Thank you.
>
> I see no insult against you. Sorry, if you already consider maybe
> sarcastic general comments insulting to you, you are not tough enough
> to survive on Usenet. BTW, in order to do that, it would also be best
> not to remove the attribution lines. Probably someone has recommended
> that to you before.
I believe it's far finer and harder to always be polite and mature
on Usenet but that's my standards. Not all follow them, sadly. As
for the being tough on the Usenet, please see this image. I
always take a look at it when feeling like responding "toughly".
http://www.uberh4x0r.org/~lethalp1mp/images/funny/retard.jpg
After i've taken a look at that image, i ALWAYS loose my steam
and reword my reply. I don't want to be that "tough on Usenet". :)
I feel I should point out that "lose" is spelt "lose" and not "loose".
I thought it was: loose, loosing, lost, have lost...
Well, one learnes something new every day. Thanks.
lose, losing, lost, have lost...
lose, losing, lost, have lost...
lose, losing, lost, have lost...
Memorized!
--
Regards
Konrad Viltersten
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SV: How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- From: Dr J R Stockton
- Re: SV: How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- References:
- How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- From: K Viltersten
- Re: How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- From: Henry
- Re: How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- From: K Viltersten
- Re: How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- From: Henry
- Re: How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- From: K Viltersten
- Re: How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
- SV: How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- From: K Viltersten
- Re: SV: How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- From: Tim Streater
- How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- Prev by Date: Re: SV: How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- Next by Date: Re: Connecting a callback action listener WITH parameters
- Previous by thread: Re: SV: How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- Next by thread: Re: SV: How optimized ar eif-statements in JS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|