Re: Internet Explorer JavaScript Weirdness
- From: Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_war@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 18, 4:25 pm, Dr J R Stockton <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Arriving and arguing with accepted convention is juvenile, and leads to
the probability of your actual questions being ignored by the more
sensible experts, and yourself ranted at by the All-Höchster.
I don't know why expressing oneself should be "arguing" to others --
nor, I maintain, why a *public* place belonging to no one should have
rules against things which harms no one -- but wer ist der All-
Höchster when he's at home???
--
(c) John Stockton, nr London UK. ?...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Turnpike v6.05 MIME.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links.
Check boilerplate spelling -- error is a public sign of incompetence.
Never fully trust an article from a poster who gives no full real name..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Internet Explorer JavaScript Weirdness
- From: Dr J R Stockton
- Re: Internet Explorer JavaScript Weirdness
- From: Joost Diepenmaat
- Re: Internet Explorer JavaScript Weirdness
- References:
- Internet Explorer JavaScript Weirdness
- From: Prisoner at War
- Re: Internet Explorer JavaScript Weirdness
- From: Prisoner at War
- Re: Internet Explorer JavaScript Weirdness
- From: Evertjan.
- Re: Internet Explorer JavaScript Weirdness
- From: Prisoner at War
- Re: Internet Explorer JavaScript Weirdness
- From: Evertjan.
- Re: Internet Explorer JavaScript Weirdness
- From: Prisoner at War
- Re: Internet Explorer JavaScript Weirdness
- From: Dr J R Stockton
- Internet Explorer JavaScript Weirdness
- Prev by Date: Re: logic and disabling onclicks?
- Next by Date: Re: html as xml document on IE
- Previous by thread: Re: Internet Explorer JavaScript Weirdness
- Next by thread: Re: Internet Explorer JavaScript Weirdness
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading