Re: ECMAStript 4, Re: Upcoming Changes to the JavaScript Language
- From: "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 03 Dec 2007 22:05:32 GMT
John G Harris wrote on 03 dec 2007 in comp.lang.javascript:
It always seems to me that they wanted a language that would run fast in
a .NET virtual machine. This means having objects with fixed data fields
and methods, and every value with a fixed type. In other words they
wanted a language that ought to be called C#Script. Merging this
language with javascript is just a way of getting people to use it.
Should we see this as a positive or a negative development?
Why would 'they' not start C#Script or C+script or C++script on it's own,
rather than kill the nice peculiarities of soft typed JS to get to the same
end?
Methinks that improving a language is just for improving,
not for unrelated ends.
It is ASP-to-ASP.NET all over again.
--
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ECMAStript 4, Re: Upcoming Changes to the JavaScript Language
- From: Spam Catcher
- Re: ECMAStript 4, Re: Upcoming Changes to the JavaScript Language
- References:
- Upcoming Changes to the JavaScript Language
- From: www.gerardvignes.com
- ECMAStript 4, Re: Upcoming Changes to the JavaScript Language
- From: Evertjan.
- Re: ECMAStript 4, Re: Upcoming Changes to the JavaScript Language
- From: John G Harris
- Upcoming Changes to the JavaScript Language
- Prev by Date: Re: Changing the button labels in a confirm box
- Next by Date: Re: Accessing an object name
- Previous by thread: Re: ECMAStript 4, Re: Upcoming Changes to the JavaScript Language
- Next by thread: Re: ECMAStript 4, Re: Upcoming Changes to the JavaScript Language
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|