Re: priveledged stranger?

Kevin Newman wrote:
>> The eval call is redundant:-
>
> The eval was put in because I will not know the name of
> the function that "dudely" represents at runtime.

But does that make any difference?

> I see now that the eval actually
> wasn't needed for the question I asked..

And it probably still is not needed.

> In case you are interested, I will be generating the function
> to be called from a third party (flash player) and I have no
> control over what the name of the function it will call is,
> but I want that function to then call a method of the object
> that created it.
<snip>

That doesn't seem particularly difficult, and certainly contains nothing
that requires an eval abuse.

Richard.


.

Relevant Pages