Re: JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- From: "neo" <nirav.thaker@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Nov 2005 01:33:00 -0800
>I'm curious what you intend to do with the UUID's ?
Generate unique number, within the scope of application.
>And if it's not for secured stuff, then why not just use an incremental
>counter ?
Ben,
Application will run in cluster, no shared memory. Marshalling int's
here and there is costly. Cluster will be time synchronized though.
.
- References:
- JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- From: neo
- Re: JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- From: Ben_
- Re: JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- From: neo
- Re: JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- From: Ben_
- Re: JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- From: neo
- Re: JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- From: neo
- Re: JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- From: neo
- Re: JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- From: Ben_
- JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- Prev by Date: Re: JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- Next by Date: Re: Xen and JVM
- Previous by thread: Re: JVM on Windows/SMP and synchronization
- Next by thread: parallel Java OS example
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|