Re: open email to the W3C
- From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:00:03 GMT
In comp.lang.java.advocacy, Roedy Green
<look-on@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:04:47 GMT
<bosud11194jb6t7o2utl4m2bn5pcejd494@xxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:59:58 GMT, Tim Tyler <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> or quoted :
>
>>Bandwidth-sensitive communication channels are typically compressed -
>>and XML is highly compressible.
>
> There are two catches. XML has so much fluff, I'd hazard it does not
> even squish as well as ASN.1 without compression.
>
> Decompressing is an expensive operation for a handheld -- the one most
> sensitive to the bandwidth squander.
>
Even ASN.1 has a bit of fluff -- but far less than XML. Decompression
also requires power (in the literal electrical sense) -- something a
handheld doesn't have a lot of.
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
- References:
- open email to the W3C
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: open email to the W3C
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: open email to the W3C
- From: asn1
- Re: open email to the W3C
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: open email to the W3C
- From: Tim Tyler
- Re: open email to the W3C
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: open email to the W3C
- From: Tim Tyler
- Re: open email to the W3C
- From: Roedy Green
- open email to the W3C
- Prev by Date: Re: open email to the W3C
- Next by Date: Re: open email to the W3C
- Previous by thread: Re: open email to the W3C
- Next by thread: Re: open email to the W3C
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|