Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Joachim Durchholz <jo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:07:44 +0200
Rainer Joswig schrieb:
There are no 'rational' goals [in language choice]. That's a myth.
Well, OK, then why do you discuss the topic?
If there's no rationality here, discussion is pointless.
Well, I'm dropping out anyway, so don't bother.
Regards,
Jo
.
- References:
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Stuart Cook
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Joachim Durchholz
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Markus E.L. 2
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Markus E.L. 2
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Neelakantan Krishnaswami
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Joachim Durchholz
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Joachim Durchholz
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: rossberg
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: rossberg
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Chris Smith
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- Prev by Date: Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- Next by Date: Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- Previous by thread: Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- Next by thread: Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|