Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: dbenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:19:17 -0700
On Aug 15, 8:56 am, Jon Harrop <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
OCaml has that behavior
# 3l == 3l;;
- : bool = false
Oh dear!
Equality is a special case of an equivalence relation; reflexive,
symmetric and transistive. Other than the (proper) determination of
equality, often it is the case that a module (structure in SML terms)
is needed to compute a desired quitvalence relation. For example,
ignoring the distinction between upper and lower case.
A very good introduction is found in
Daniel J. Velleman
How To Prove It: a structured approach
now, I think, in a second or third edition.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Markus E.L. 2
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- References:
- Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Rene de Visser
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Stuart Cook
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: rossberg
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Joachim Durchholz
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- From: Jon Harrop
- Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- Prev by Date: Re: Is there a parser combinator library (or lisp macro solution) for LR parsing?
- Next by Date: Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- Previous by thread: Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- Next by thread: Re: Glasgow haskell vs. Lispworks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|