Re: DOES> (again)
- From: Andrew Haley <andrew29@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 06:00:30 -0600
Albert van der Horst <albert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The analysis is much easier if done object oriented.
The standard require that DOES> results in remembering something.
An extra data item! So you can't ever accommodate that by
your standard headers if all fields are used up.
What are you referring to? We already know, from example, that in ITC
the only header field needed for DOES> is the code field.