comp.lang.forth

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Off-topic politics [Was Re: Chuck Moore news]
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Off-topic politics [Was Re: Chuck Moore news]
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: RfD: KEY/EKEY
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Off-topic politics [Was Re: Chuck Moore news]
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: rickman
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• RfD: KEY/EKEY
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• RfD: Definition Name Length
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• RfD: Escaped Strings (Version 6.2)
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• RfD: Assign
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2 version 1.1
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: Forth 2009
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• crown holder importers, exporters, long jeans:crown holder manufacturers,(www.trade8.cc)
  • From: rabbitwood
• Re: Forth 2009
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: hansoft
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: rickman
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: jagmarz
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: rickman
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• RfD: Unneeded restriction in FASINH
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2 version 1.1
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: MarkWills
• Re: Forth 2009
  • From: MarkWills
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: MarkWills
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jeff Fox
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Is Forth suitable for writing compilers?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: nibble
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Roger Ivie
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: John Passaniti
• Forth 2009
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Is Forth suitable for writing compilers?
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Is Forth suitable for writing compilers?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Is Forth suitable for writing compilers?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Is Forth suitable for writing compilers?
  • From: Oyster
• Re: Is Forth suitable for writing compilers?
  • From: DavidM
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Is Forth suitable for writing compilers?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: Is Forth suitable for writing compilers?
  • From: ayrnieu
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Ed
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Greg Bailey
• Re: Is Forth suitable for writing compilers?
  • From: Jeff M.
• Re: Is Forth suitable for writing compilers?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Is Forth suitable for writing compilers?
  • From: ayrnieu
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: BruceMcF
• Is Forth suitable for writing compilers?
  • From: Joel Reymont
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Spam
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: MarkWills
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Spam
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: rickman
• Re: Chuck Moore news
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Chuck Moore news
  • From: MarkWills
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Ed
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: Stephen J. Bevan
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: MarkWills
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: MarkWills
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: ayrnieu
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: ayrnieu
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: MarkWills
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: MarkWills
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: MarkWills
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: Jacko
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: kenney
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: DavidM
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: DavidM
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: MarkWills
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Spam
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Helmar
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Gerry
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Gerry
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Gerry
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Should not be Forth a part of Cyberpunk equipment?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: alextangent
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: alextangent
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: alextangent
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Gerry
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Helmar
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Helmar
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Helmar
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Helmar
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: alextangent
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: noah . ryan . 06
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Gerry
• How to make Forth interesting?
  • From: DavidM
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Parsing null strings
  • From: BruceMcF
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: georgeahubert
• Re: RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: Erwan Maréchal
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Parsing null strings
  • From: Harold
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• RfD: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: Erwan Maréchal
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andreas
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: Erwan Maréchal
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: Helmar
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: Erwan Maréchal
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: MarkWills
• Re: GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: BruceMcF
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Helmar
• GForth, ANS, and old conventions
  • From: Erwan Maréchal
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Gerry
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Re (2): nibz/wiki/InstructionSet ?
  • From: Jacko
• Re: nibz/wiki/InstructionSet ?
  • From: Jacko
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfDs on Forth200x website
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfDs on Forth200x website
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• RfDs on Forth200x website
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features
  • From: Stephen J. Bevan
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Ed
• Re: Parsing null strings
  • From: Ed
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Ed
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Parsing null strings
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Parsing null strings
  • From: Ed
• Re: Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Is there a forth equivalent of sscanf ?
  • From: Tinkerer Atlarge
• Re (2): nibz/wiki/InstructionSet ?
  • From: AliBama
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Jeff Fox
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Jacko
• Performance of different Forth systems
  • From: Gerry
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Jeff Fox
• Re: Rosetta's AMB
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: Parsing null strings
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Jeff M.
• Re: ANN: hexfloat library update
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: rickman
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: William James
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: 4engineershelp
• Re: Rosetta's AMB
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Parsing null strings
  • From: Ed
• Re: nibz/wiki/InstructionSet ?
  • From: rickman
• nibz/wiki/InstructionSet ?
  • From: AliBama
• ANN: hexfloat library update
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Parsing null strings
  • From: Harold
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Bullshit! - Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: rickman
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Jeff Fox
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Jeff Fox
• Re: Bullshit! - Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: Jecel
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Jeff Fox
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Jeff Fox
• Re: Rosetta's AMB
  • From: William James
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: William James
• Re: Bullshit! - Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features
  • From: Stephen J. Bevan
• Re: Bullshit! - Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features
  • From: Stephen J. Bevan
• Re: Bullshit! - Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: rickman
• Re: Of course it IS!!! - was once wimpily (Re: Is Forth still interesting?)
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Of course it IS!!! - was once wimpily (Re: Is Forth still interesting?)
  • From: Jecel
• Re: Bullshit! - Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Bullshit! - Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Bullshit! - Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Jeff M.
• Re: Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Bullshit! - Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Bullshit! - Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Bullshit! - Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Bullshit! - Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Jan Coombs
• Open stack and colon definitions as a features (was: Of course it IS!!!)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Ed
• Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: David Brown
• Re: Of course it IS!!! - was once wimpily (Re: Is Forth still interesting?)
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Of course it IS!!! - was once wimpily (Re: Is Forth still interesting?)
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Of course it IS!!! - was once wimpily (Re: Is Forth still interesting?)
  • From: Jecel
• Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Of course it IS!!! - was once wimpily (Re: Is Forth still interesting?)
  • From: Jeff M.
• Re: Of course it IS!!! - was once wimpily (Re: Is Forth still interesting?)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: rickman
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Peter Fischer
• Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: Roger Ivie
• Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: Roger Ivie
• Re: Zero operand CPUs
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Zero operand CPUs
  • From: rickman
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: RogerLevy
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: RogerLevy
• Re: Of course it IS!!! - was once wimpily (Re: Is Forth still interesting?)
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Of course it IS!!! - was once wimpily (Re: Is Forth still interesting?)
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Of course it IS!!! - was once wimpily (Re: Is Forth still interesting?)
  • From: Jeff M.
• Re: Of course it IS!!! - was once wimpily (Re: Is Forth still interesting?)
  • From: rios . lucho
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Of course it IS!!! - was once wimpily (Re: Is Forth still interesting?)
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: rickman
• Re: Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Of course it IS!!! - was once wimpily (Re: Is Forth still interesting?)
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: John Passaniti
• Is Forth still interesting?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Rosetta's AMB
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Rosetta's AMB
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Rosetta's AMB
  • From: Joseph Frippiat
• Re: Rosetta's AMB
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Forth MP Code? Pi Day.
  • From: datajerk
• Re: Forth MP Code? Pi Day.
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Forth MP Code? Pi Day.
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Forth MP Code? Pi Day.
  • From: datajerk
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• dumbsh.fs
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Rosetta's AMB
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Rosetta's AMB
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Forth MP Code? Pi Day.
  • From: datajerk
• Re: Forth MP Code? Pi Day.
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: rickman
• Rosetta's AMB
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: hansoft
• Re: Free PC boards with FORTH MC68HC11
  • From: Cecil Bayona
• Re: RfD - N>R and NR>
  • From: BruceMcF
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: rickman
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: rickman
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: David N. Williams
• Free PC boards with FORTH MC68HC11
  • From: bkphotoscenes
• Forth guy running for President of the USA by Amendment
  • From: hohensee
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Ed
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: bitbarf
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: bitbarf
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: RfD - N>R and NR>
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: hansoft
• Ambiguity in FATAN2
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: RfD - N>R and NR>
  • From: Ed
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: I want to learn forth but...
  • From: rickman
• Re: I want to learn forth but...
  • From: pml540114
• Re: I want to learn forth but...
  • From: pml540114
• Re: instruction stack
  • From: pml540114
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: rickman
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: rickman
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: rickman
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: rickman
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: rickman
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD - N>R and NR>
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: rickman
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: rickman
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: rickman
• Re: RfD - N>R and NR>
  • From: Ed
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: g . bergstrom
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: rickman
• Re: Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: instruction stack
  • From: rickman
• Reference Point for Code Size
  • From: rickman
• instruction stack
  • From: Ivan Tikhonov
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: llforth
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: llforth
  • From: Helmar
• Re: llforth
  • From: Victor Marzo
• Re: llforth
  • From: Victor Marzo
• Re: RfD - N>R and NR>
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfD - N>R and NR>
  • From: Ed
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: W32F - Alex McDonald: Permission to publish a translation?
  • From: alextangent
• Re: W32F - Alex McDonald: Permission to publish a translation?
  • From: alextangent
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: llforth
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: W32F - Alex McDonald: Permission to publish a translation?
  • From: mka
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: llforth
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: llforth
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: W32F - Alex McDonald: Permission to publish a translation?
  • From: dirk
• Invitation to irc.freenode.net #forthcafe
  • From: Julian Fondren
• Re: W32F - Alex McDonald: Permission to publish a translation?
  • From: georgeahubert
• W32F - Alex McDonald: Permission to publish a translation?
  • From: Michael
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Shared library interface
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Helmar
• Shared library interface
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: llforth
  • From: Helmar
• Re: C library interface
  • From: alextangent
• Re: llforth
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Forth input line buffered, why?
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: Forth input line buffered, why?
  • From: kenney
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: sean
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: C library interface
  • From: alextangent
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Anton Ertl
• ANS Forth test programs
  • From: Gerry
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Helmar
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO primitives
  • From: Andrew McKewan
• Re: OO primitives
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Helmar
• Re: OO primitives
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Forth input line buffered, why?
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Forth input line buffered, why?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Forth input line buffered, why?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Helmar
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Forth input line buffered, why?
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Forth input line buffered, why?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Forth input line buffered, why?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Forth input line buffered, why?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Forth input line buffered, why?
  • From: celephicus
• Re: C library interface
  • From: alextangent
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: OO primitives
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: C library interface
  • From: alextangent
• Re: OO primitives
  • From: Gerry
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Helmar
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Helmar
• Re: C library interface
  • From: alextangent
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: C library interface
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: C Libraries [Was: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?]
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: gforth libffi.fs callback problems
  • From: Andrew Haley
• C library interface
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• C Libraries [Was: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?]
  • From: Andrew Haley
• llforth
  • From: Victor Marzo
• Re: gforth libffi.fs callback problems
  • From: pliz
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: pliz
• Re: gforth libffi.fs callback problems
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: pliz
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Ivar Access
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Ivar Access
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: FLAG (was Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: glforth question
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Jacko
• FLAG (was Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?)
  • From: alextangent
• OOF needs extra documentation in gforth [0.6.2]
  • From: AliBama
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: alextangent
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: alextangent
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: alextangent
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: alextangent
• Re: glforth question
  • From: Gerald Wodni
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Martin Krischik
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Martin Krischik
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Andreas
• Re: Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Is Forth more focused on detail rather than on concept?
  • From: Helmar
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: kenney
• Re: Tinyboot
  • From: bitbarf
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: LALR parser generator
  • From: Michael Ben-Yosef
• Re: Creole Forth is dead? Please give a link to source
  • From: zerohoo . kim
• Re: Creole Forth is dead? Please give a link to source
  • From: Cecil
• Re: LALR parser generator
  • From: W Dan Meyer
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Jacko
• Re: gforth libffi.fs callback problems
  • From: pliz
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: gforth libffi.fs callback problems
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: gforth libffi.fs callback problems
  • From: pliz
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: gforth libffi.fs callback problems
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: double usingle multiply with double returned
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Programming language popularity
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: double usingle multiply with double returned
  • From: Coos Haak
• Programming language popularity
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: double usingle multiply with double returned
  • From: datajerk
• Re: Human stack shufflers ?
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: double usingle multiply with double returned
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: double usingle multiply with double returned
  • From: datajerk
• gforth libffi.fs callback problems
  • From: pliz
• Re: double usingle multiply with double returned
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: double usingle multiply with double returned
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD -- FVALUE vsn 2.0
  • From: Ed
• Re: Human stack shufflers ?
  • From: AliBama

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Comp  > comp.lang.forth  > 2009-03