comp.lang.forth

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: Ton 't Lam
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Callbacks in gforth-0.6.9-20080716
  • From: ddaa
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: forth 2 algol-like, bablefish quality translator ?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: forth 2 algol-like, bablefish quality translator ?
  • From: jacko
• Re: local buffers and tail-call optimization
  • From: Peter Fälth
• Re: local buffers and tail-call optimization
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• forth 2 algol-like, bablefish quality translator ?
  • From: problems
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: Frank
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: Frank
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Sorting routine
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Sorting routine
  • From: Frank
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Advanced Forth app techniques
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Advanced Forth app techniques
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Advanced Forth app techniques
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: David N. Williams
• local buffers and tail-call optimization
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Advanced Forth app techniques
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Advanced Forth app techniques
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: FORTH on Cell/PS-3
  • From: Charles Davis
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Advanced Forth app techniques
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: FORTH on Cell/PS-3
  • From: Charles Davis
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Ed
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: PLCs and forth
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: John Passaniti
• PostFix: A Simple Stack Language
  • From: Charles Turner
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: winston19842005@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Ed
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: Charlie Springer
• Re: a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: John Passaniti
• FORTH on Cell/PS-3
  • From: Peter Mortensen
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: BAK and FORTH -Guy Macon
  • From: morrimichael
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: PLCs and forth
  • From: Fanzo
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Advanced Forth app techniques
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Intellasys News?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Intellasys News?
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: gavino
• a relational database done in forth would r0ck
  • From: gavino
• Re: PLCs and forth
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: PLCs and forth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Advanced Forth app techniques
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Forth is Factorable --- factoring out DO ... LOOP
  • From: astrobe
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Forth is Factorable --- factoring out DO ... LOOP
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Advanced Forth app techniques
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: gavino
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: gavino
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Forth is Factorable --- factoring out DO ... LOOP
  • From: billy
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: gavino
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Advanced Forth app techniques
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Celime
• Re: Forth is Factorable --- factoring out DO ... LOOP
  • From: astrobe
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: gavino
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Forth is Factorable --- factoring out DO ... LOOP
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Forth is Factorable --- factoring out DO ... LOOP
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Forth is Factorable --- factoring out DO ... LOOP
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: Intellasys News?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Forth is Factorable --- factoring out DO ... LOOP
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Forth is Factorable --- factoring out DO ... LOOP
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: Forth is Factorable --- factoring out DO ... LOOP
  • From: John Passaniti
• Intellasys News?
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Forth is Factorable --- factoring out DO ... LOOP
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: jzakiya
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Ed
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: jacko
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: gavino
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• unwind-protect (was: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long))
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Coos Haak
• Updated Forth OO Extensions Files
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: gavino
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: gavino
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Celime
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: jacko
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: jacko
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: jacko
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: rickman
• Finalizers [was: Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)]
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Celime
• Re: BAK and FORTH -Guy Macon
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: DavidM
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• any try this forth webserver? the code looks incomprehensible to me http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/httpd-en.html
  • From: gavino
• Gforth compiled with LLVM and gcc
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Ed
• Re: BAK and FORTH -Guy Macon
  • From: jacko
• Re: forth for iPod touch?
  • From: Frank Buss
• Re: any los angeles forth meetings coming up?
  • From: jcomeauictx
• forth for iPod touch?
  • From: jcomeauictx
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: jacko
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - (Off Topic)Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: RfD - (Off Topic)Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Peter Fälth
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Peter Fälth
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: jacko
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Ed
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: jacko
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Ed
• Re: any los angeles forth meetings coming up?
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: George Hubert
• any los angeles forth meetings coming up?
  • From: gavino
• Andy Valencia is looking for someone to take over forthOS
  • From: gavino
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Ed
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: OO in Forth
  • From: kenney
• Re: OO in Forth
  • From: morrimichael
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Peter Fälth
• Re: >ORDER and ORDER>
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Peter Fälth
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO in Forth
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Celime
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Mike Hore
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: rickman
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• EuroForth 2008 registration deadline coming up
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Celime
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Problem using LEAVE
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Mike Hore
• Re: vandys@forthos.org is forthos dead? email bounced from ?vandys@forthos.org
  • From: rickman
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: vandys@forthos.org is forthos dead? email bounced from ?vandys@forthos.org
  • From: vandys
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Here's an interesting design problem on the use of external libraries
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's an interesting design problem on the use of external libraries
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Here's an interesting design problem on the use of external libraries
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Here's an interesting design problem on the use of external libraries
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: jzakiya
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: jzakiya
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: rickman
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: jzakiya
• Re: Problem using LEAVE
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Here's an interesting design problem on the use of external libraries
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Gforth snapshot 0.6.9-20080716
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: OO in Forth
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: Gforth snapshot 0.6.9-20080716
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: jacko
• RfD - Local buffers, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax, v4 (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: vandys@forthos.org is forthos dead? email bounced from ?vandys@forthos.org
  • From: Me
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: me
• Re: Problem using LEAVE
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Using DevIL in PowerMops
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's an interesting design problem on the use of external libraries
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's an interesting design problem on the use of external libraries
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: the toaster story
  • From: Frank Buss
• Re: Problem using LEAVE
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: Here's an interesting design problem on the use of external libraries
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• the toaster story
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: Nibz @ 472 LEs
  • From: jacko
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: >ORDER and ORDER>
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Here's an interesting design problem on the use of external libraries
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OO in Forth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: DavidM
• Re: OO in Forth
  • From: joelseph
• >ORDER and ORDER> (was: EVALUATE for inlining)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Gforth snapshot 0.6.9-20080716
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO in Forth
  • From: morrimichael
• Re: OO in Forth
  • From: morrimichael
• Re: calling strings from blocks
  • From: Matthew
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: joelseph
• Re: vandys@forthos.org is forthos dead? email bounced from ?vandys@forthos.org
  • From: vandys
• Re: refcounting protocols and Forth
  • From: morrimichael
• Re: vandys@forthos.org is forthos dead? email bounced from vandys@forthos.org
  • From: rickman
• Re: OO ruminations
  • From: morrimichael
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Old-style ffi callbacks in CVS gforth
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: rickman
• Re: OO ruminations
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO ruminations
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• vandys@forthos.org is forthos dead? email bounced from vandys@forthos.org
  • From: gavino
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: John Rible
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: rickman
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: OO ruminations
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Problem using LEAVE
  • From: cjmcc
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: OO ruminations
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO ruminations
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO ruminations
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: kenney
• Re: OO ruminations
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: OO ruminations
  • From: Charles Turner
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: John Rible
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: rickman
• OO ruminations
  • From: Mike Hore
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: brian . fox
• Re: kitty
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: jacko
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: jacko
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Larry Elmore
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: kitty
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: Problem using LEAVE
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Problem using LEAVE
  • From: George Hubert
• Nibz @ 472 LEs
  • From: jacko
• Re: Problem using LEAVE
  • From: Steve Graham
• Re: Problem using LEAVE
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: rickman
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Problem using LEAVE
  • From: cjmcc
• Re: kitty
  • From: winston19842005@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: kitty
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Mike Hore
• Re: kitty
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: rickman
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: jzakiya
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: rickman
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: kitty
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: EVALUATE for inlining
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: Database of LIT to single xt?
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: EVALUATE for inlining
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• re: kitty
  • From: Ed Falat
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: rickman
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: rickman
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: rickman
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Database of LIT to single xt?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Database of LIT to single xt?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Database of LIT to single xt?
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Celime
• Re: calling strings from blocks
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: EVALUATE for inlining
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: calling strings from blocks
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: calling strings from blocks
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: calling strings from blocks
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• calling strings from blocks
  • From: Matthew
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: jzakiya
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: EVALUATE for inlining
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: jacko
• Re: 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: Database of LIT to single xt?
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: EVALUATE for inlining
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Celime
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Celime
• Re: EVALUATE for inlining
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Gforth snapshot 0.6.9-20080716
  • From: pliz
• 3rd RfD: Directories
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: EVALUATE for inlining
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Database of LIT to single xt?
  • From: jacko
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: EVALUATE for inlining
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: EVALUATE for inlining
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Celime
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• EVALUATE for inlining (was: OO syntax)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Gforth snapshot 0.6.9-20080716
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Database of LIT to single xt?
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Gforth snapshot 0.6.9-20080716
  • From: pliz
• Re: Gforth snapshot 0.6.9-20080716
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Database of LIT to single xt?
  • From: rickman
• Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please!
  • From: rickman
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: jzakiya
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: Database of LIT to single xt?
  • From: jacko
• Re: Gforth snapshot 0.6.9-20080716
  • From: pliz
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: billy
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: foxchip
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: jzakiya
• Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please!
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Easy balanced tree
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: foxchip
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please!
  • From: ilikemachines
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Celime
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Database of LIT to single xt?
  • From: rickman
• Re: Database of LIT to single xt?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Database of LIT to single xt?
  • From: jacko
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Celime
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Celime
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Celime
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: George Hubert
• primitives vs cleverness vs readability
  • From: DavidM
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Slava Pestov
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: rickman
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: StrongForth for Linux (and windows)
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: StrongForth for Linux (and windows)
  • From: Stephan Becher
• Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please!
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please!
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Easy balanced tree
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: StrongForth for Linux (and windows)
  • From: DavidM
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: rickman
• Re: StrongForth for Linux (and windows)
  • From: Stephan Becher
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: me
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: DavidM
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please!
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• StrongForth for Linux (and windows)
  • From: DavidM
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Raoul Fleckman
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: gforth and sh inside of a colon definition
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: rickman
• Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please!
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: gforth and sh inside of a colon definition
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: gforth and sh inside of a colon definition
  • From: Matthew
• Re: OO in Forth
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• gforth and sh inside of a colon definition
  • From: Matthew
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: jacko
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: rickman
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: separate stacks
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: OO in Forth
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• separate stacks
  • From: DavidM
• Forth going up in the eulerproject
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: OO in Forth
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: OO in Forth
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: OO syntax
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: See a 3D animation programmed in Forth - Feedback appreciated
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: See a 3D animation programmed in Forth - Feedback appreciated
  • From: roger.levy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: spam
• Re: Gforth snapshot 0.6.9-20080716
  • From: pliz
• Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve of Zakiya (SoZ)
  • From: jzakiya
• Re: Forth bootstrapping framework - Bootforth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please!
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Forth bootstrapping framework - Bootforth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Gforth snapshot 0.6.9-20080716
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: rickman
• Re: Forth for PIC18
  • From: Mikael Nordman
• Tiny CPU NIBZ (Successor to Indi)
  • From: jacko
• Re: See a 3D animation programmed in Forth - Feedback appreciated
  • From: pliz
• Re: Gforth snapshot 0.6.9-20080716
  • From: pliz
• Licensing and 200x structures
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please!
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please!
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Forth bootstrapping framework - Bootforth
  • From: Nickolai Leschov
• Re: Forth bootstrapping framework - Bootforth
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Forth bootstrapping framework - Bootforth
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Forth bootstrapping framework - Bootforth
  • From: Nickolai Leschov
• Re: Forth bootstrapping framework - Bootforth
  • From: Nickolai Leschov
• Re: Forth for PIC18
  • From: Nickolai Leschov
• Re: Forth for PIC18
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Gforth snapshot 0.6.9-20080716
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: See a 3D animation programmed in Forth - Feedback appreciated
  • From: aguai
• Re: Forth bootstrapping framework - Bootforth
  • From: rickman
• Re: Forth seems very cool, but a little perspective, please!
  • From: Ed
• Re: Forth bootstrapping framework - Bootforth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Gforth snapshot 0.6.9-20080716
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: Forth for PIC18
  • From: DavidM

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Comp  > comp.lang.forth  > 2008-08