Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 21:03:33 -0600
Guy Macon wrote:
John Doty wrote:
One more comment: to worry excessively about fallacies indicates a profound commitment to avoid facing reality.
....says the man who believes things that are not true
based on nothing more than a logical fallacy.
.... says a man who believes that *any* evidence may be canceled by the concept of a "null hypothesis".
.... says a man who thinks a method of reasoning that has a historical record of repeated failure constitutes "critical thinking".
.... says a man who has never correctly identified any fallacy in my argument.
Should 18th century physicists have abandoned Newtonian mechanics and returned to a belief in Aristotelian physics when Berkeley showed that it was based on fallacious reasoning? Straight answer, no evasion please.
--
John Doty, Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
--
History teaches that logical consistency is neither sufficient nor necessary to establish practical, real world truth. Those who attempt to use logic for that purpose are abusing it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: Jonah Thomas
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- References:
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: John Doty
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: John Doty
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: John Doty
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: John Doty
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- Prev by Date: Re: The Promise of Forth
- Next by Date: Re: The Promise of Forth
- Previous by thread: Re: The Promise of Forth
- Next by thread: Re: The Promise of Forth
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|