Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com/>
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 21:39:17 +0000
John Doty wrote:
Guy Macon wrote:
There is no need to demonstrate in detail that you don't know
what a null hypothesis is and are thus only able to argue
against a strawman parody of it. We already know that from
the rest of your writing.
Demonstrate exactly how this parody differs in any important
detail from your method of argument.
Nope. Not worth the effort. You appear to be ineducable.
You have been advised to read a book on critical thinking.
Obviously you have decided to not heed that advice.
I have read a great many books on critical thinking. The most recent one
is "18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics" (Reuben
Hersh, Ed.), a wonderful demolition of Platonism, and containing some
real wisdom about how we might replace it.
Another fine essay is "The Nature of Knowledge" by R. A. Lyttleton.
Unbelievable. You don't even know what the phrase "Critical
Thinking" means! You actauully think that the above two
books qualify as books on critical thinking.
Free clue: if a book does not contain at least on chapter on the
topic of fallacies, it probably isn't a book about critical thinking.
If you ever decide to address your ignorance, here is a good
place to start: http://www.austhink.org/critical/pages/fallacies.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: John Doty
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- References:
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: John Doty
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- From: John Doty
- Re: The Promise of Forth
- Prev by Date: forth port for m68k
- Next by Date: Re: forth port for m68k
- Previous by thread: Re: The Promise of Forth
- Next by thread: Re: The Promise of Forth
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|