Re: advantages of forth over other languages
- From: Richard Owlett <rowlett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:56:47 -0500
John Passaniti wrote:
Andreas Klimas wrote:
Very important in the past. But these days the *systems* are interactive and I can get around the edit/build/test loop in a few seconds even with a compile/link language. Faster than I can think ;-)
and it is still clumsy.
you need a C-File, probable H-File, edit Makefile, take
care of dependency have to link a lot of libraries every
time only to get a small (test) function running.
Yes, if you have C code, you're probably going to put it in a C file. Thanks for pointing that out. I'm going to take a wild guess here and say you're storing your Forth code somewhere.
[snip sillyness ]
OK so I did not bother reading it
why should I
Am I treating his comments any differently than he did OP ?????????
less sarcasm
more reason
plz
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: advantages of forth over other languages
- From: John Passaniti
- Re: advantages of forth over other languages
- References:
- Re: advantages of forth over other languages
- From: Andreas Klimas
- Re: advantages of forth over other languages
- From: John Passaniti
- Re: advantages of forth over other languages
- Prev by Date: Re: advantages of forth over other languages
- Next by Date: Re: paul grahams arc, a new lisp, and his words about makign code ?shorter, vs forth?
- Previous by thread: Re: advantages of forth over other languages
- Next by thread: Re: advantages of forth over other languages
- Index(es):