Re: The Promise of Forth

On Apr 1, 2:29 pm, Aleksej Saushev <a...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bruce McFarling <agil...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Mar 25, 10:52 pm, John Doty <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Except that projects in other languages don't experience such severe
problems. This is shown by the large bases of shared code that are
created and understood by large collaborations with very little
management. So it *is* a language problem.

Again, you present evidence that is compatible with your conclusion,
as well as others, as if it supports your conclusion, and no others,
and therefore is persuasive evidence for your conclusion.

Sorry? Could you articulate what incompatibility you see?
'Cause I don't see any.

The problem with confirmation bias is that compatibility between
evidence and conclusion is not on its own sufficient to make a
persuasive case for a conclusion.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Promise of Forth
    ... This is shown by the large bases of shared code that are ... created and understood by large collaborations with very little ... management. ... and therefore is persuasive evidence for your conclusion. ...
    (comp.lang.forth)
  • Re: The Promise of Forth
    ... This is shown by the large bases of shared code that are ... created and understood by large collaborations with very little ... management. ... and therefore is persuasive evidence for your conclusion. ...
    (comp.lang.forth)
  • Re: The Promise of Forth
    ... This is shown by the large bases of shared code that are ... created and understood by large collaborations with very little ... management. ... and therefore is persuasive evidence for your conclusion. ...
    (comp.lang.forth)
Quantcast