part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
http://www.mpeforth.com/arena/ProgramForth.pdf section 21
I know I should stop theorizing but wouldn't it make sense that
something good in small memory systems would do really well with lots
of memory EG modern intel commodity hardware?
Or do things like lisp have garbage collection etc( he mentions) that
make it simpler that forth for non memory thin hardware?
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
... I know I should stop theorizing but wouldn't it make sense that ... something good in small memory systems would do really well with lots ... of memory EG modern intel commodity hardware? ...
(comp.lang.forth) - Re: The memory wall problem: a quantiative approach?
... > The real goal is to quantify the performance gap between X ... Could Yogesh provide more information on that? ... >>> I have been wanting to conduct a quantitative study on the memory wall ... >> if you model all the memory systems during the Y years. ...
(comp.arch) - Re: The memory wall problem: a quantiative approach?
... Could Yogesh provide more information on that? ... >> I have been wanting to conduct a quantitative study on the memory wall ... You will find from previous published research a measure ... > if you model all the memory systems during the Y years. ...
(comp.arch) - Re: Shared Data Problem
... > use a single non-interruptable instruction to manipulate a shared ... > larger than the physical memory bus width and the variable aligned in ... > memory systems, some interlocking mechanisms are usually available, ...
(comp.arch.embedded) - Re: Total memory used
... WinXP will try to find a use for all available memory. ... low memory systems is essentially correct, it will use what it finds, then ... With large amounts of ram, ... Rick Rogers aka "Nutcase" MS-MVP - Windows ...
(microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics) |
|
