comp.lang.forth

• Thread Index

---

• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: GForth 6.2 built on Mac Xcode troubles
  • From: Robert Spykerman
• Re: Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• bright forth for BCC52 SBC
  • From: aiiadict
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: f. to string?
  • From: Ed
• Re: GForth 6.2 built on Mac Xcode troubles
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: f. to string?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: f. to string?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Images and libraries
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Images and libraries
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Images and libraries
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: f. to string?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: kenney
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: kenney
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Reinhold Straub
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: f. to string?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: f. to string?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: f. to string?
  • From: Ed
• Re: f. to string?
  • From: Ed
• Re: >FLOAT behavior with null string
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Building gforth on Eee PC stock Xandros
  • From: Robert Spykerman
• Re: GForth 6.2 built on Mac Xcode troubles
  • From: Robert Spykerman
• Re: >FLOAT behavior with null string
  • From: Ed
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: f. to string?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: >FLOAT behavior with null string
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Images and libraries
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: >FLOAT behavior with null string
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: William James
• Re: >FLOAT behavior with null string
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: f. to string?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: William James
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: William James
• Re: >FLOAT behavior with null string
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: >FLOAT behavior with null string
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• >FLOAT behavior with null string
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Fast FEXP approximation
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Images and libraries
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: f. to string?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Images and libraries
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: f. to string?
  • From: Helmar
• f. to string?
  • From: Frank Buss
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Reinhold Straub
• Re: Images and libraries
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Images and libraries
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Mikael Nordman
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Robert Miller
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Ed
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: John Passaniti
• Images and libraries (was: OBJECTS.FS Question)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Mysterious baud rate change
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Fast FEXP approximation
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Type checking (was: The strengths of FORTH)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Helmar
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Jenny Brien
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Mikael Nordman
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: astrobe
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Gerry
• Re: Mysterious baud rate change
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: OBJECTS.FS Question
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Benny Andersen
• Re: Fast FEXP approximation
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Mysterious baud rate change
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: OBJECTS.FS Question
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Mysterious baud rate change
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: The OO approach
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: OBJECTS.FS Question
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth (doty)
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Fast FEXP approximation
  • From: Frank
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: The Promise of Forth (Doty)
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• The OO approach
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: OBJECTS.FS Question
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: gavino
• The strengths of FORTH
  • From: Robert Miller
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Marc Olschok
• SeaForth and Supercomputing (was: SaeForth and Supercomputing)
  • From: forther
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• AIMind - Win32Forth
  • From: Frank
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: JK
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: JK
• Re: Mysterious baud rate change
  • From: Helmar
• Mysterious baud rate change
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: astrobe
• Re: The Promise of Forth (doty)
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: William James
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: William James
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: The Promise of Forth (Doty)
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• OBJECTS.FS Question
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The Promise of Forth (Doty)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth (Doty)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth (Doty)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: SaeForth and Supercomputing (was: The future of computing)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The future again (was: SaeForth and Supercomputing)
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: The Promise of Forth (Doty)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Passaniti
• The future again (was: SaeForth and Supercomputing)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OOP-forth ?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: The Promise of Forth (doty)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Stan Katz
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth (Doty)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth (Doty)
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: The Promise of Forth (Doty)
  • From: William James
• Re: The Promise of Forth (Doty)
  • From: William James
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: The Promise of Forth (doty)
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: The Promise of Forth (Doty)
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Robert Miller
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: William James
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: C ate my evaluatrion stack
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Fast FEXP approximation
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jenny Brien
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: JK
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: SaeForth and Supercomputing (was: The future of computing)
  • From: Jeff M.
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Marc Olschok
• Re: Fast FEXP approximation
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: SaeForth and Supercomputing (was: The future of computing)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Fast FEXP approximation
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: Fast FEXP approximation
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: How does this Mini-OOF thing work, again?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• SaeForth and Supercomputing (was: The future of computing)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: How does this Mini-OOF thing work, again?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The future of computing (is Forth left behind?)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: The future of computing (is Forth left behind?)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: The future of computing (is Forth left behind?)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Fast FEXP approximation
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: How does this Mini-OOF thing work, again?
  • From: Gerry
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Gerry
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Stephen J. Bevan
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The future of computing (is Forth left behind?)
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Frank Buss
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: brian . fox
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Robert Miller
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The future of computing (is Forth left behind?)
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: How does this Mini-OOF thing work, again?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: How does this Mini-OOF thing work, again?
  • From: jacko
• C ate my evaluatrion stack
  • From: jacko
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Gerry
• Re: The future of computing (is Forth left behind?)
  • From: jacko
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: How does this Mini-OOF thing work, again?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: How does this Mini-OOF thing work, again?
  • From: Gerry
• Re: The future of computing (is Forth left behind?)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: How does this Mini-OOF thing work, again?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: How does this Mini-OOF thing work, again?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: How does this Mini-OOF thing work, again?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: How does this Mini-OOF thing work, again?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• The future of computing (is Forth left behind?)
  • From: Jeff M.
• How does this Mini-OOF thing work, again?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Gerry
• Re: VFX Forth for Linux and hello world
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Robert Miller
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Gerry
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: kenney
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: William James
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• VFX Forth for Linux and hello world
  • From: Luca Masini
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Matlab executes Forth commands
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Mike Hore
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Robert Miller
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: Writing floating point values to file
  • From: Larry Webber
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Writing floating point values to file
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: kenney
• Re: The word RECURSE
  • From: Montesquiou
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: William James
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: William James
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Writing floating point values to file
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: The word RECURSE
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: :r4 new version
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Is interpret/compile the wrong distinction?
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Matlab executes Forth commands
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: The word RECURSE
  • From: Montesquiou
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Writing floating point values to file
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Writing floating point values to file
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Writing floating point values to file
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Writing floating point values to file
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: brian . fox
• Re: The Promise of Forth
  • From: Axel Harvey
• Re: The word RECURSE
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Writing floating point values to file
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Writing floating point values to file
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Writing floating point values to file
  • From: Larry Webber
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: Z80 CP/M Forth & loading code from disk
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Mike Hore
• Re: Writing floating point values to file
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• The Promise of Forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Writing floating point values to file
  • From: Larry Webber
• Re: Z80 CP/M Forth & loading code from disk
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Frank Buss
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Montesquiou
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: William James
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: The word RECURSE
  • From: Montesquiou
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: The word RECURSE
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: The word RECURSE
  • From: Montesquiou
• Re: Standard Discussion Again
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: brian . fox
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: The word RECURSE
  • From: Montesquiou
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: William James
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: William James
• Re: The word RECURSE
  • From: Montesquiou
• Forth for the Macintosh (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: The word RECURSE
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: William James
• The word RECURSE
  • From: Montesquiou
• Re: The word RECURSE
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Frank Buss
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Standard Discussion Again
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: brian . fox
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: JK
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Z80 CP/M Forth & loading code from disk
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Standard Discussion Again
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Z80 CP/M Forth & loading code from disk
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Creating and using arrays - again
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: Z80 CP/M Forth & loading code from disk
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Frank Buss
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: SOD64 - a 64bit Stack Oriented Design Processor
  • From: Charlie Springer
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Learning HP-71B FORTH
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Learning HP-71B FORTH
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Learning HP-71B FORTH
  • From: John Pierce
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Ed
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Ed
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: U*- and U/+
  • From: jacko
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: JK
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: JK
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better
  • From: kenney
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• :r4 new version
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: U*- and U/+
  • From: m_l_g3
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better
  • From: Tony Mc
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Standard Discussion Again (was Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?)
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: U*- and U/+
  • From: jacko
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Coos Haak
• U*- and U/+
  • From: jacko
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Standard Discussion Again (was Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?)
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Noqsi Aerospace Programming System (was Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?)
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better
  • From: kenney
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: Ed
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Where are the SVFIG folks?
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: Ed
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Ed
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• FSL: proposed new specifications related to array words
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Where are the SVFIG folks?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Where are the SVFIG folks?
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: Where are the SVFIG folks?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Where are the SVFIG folks?
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Where are the SVFIG folks?
  • From: foxchip
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Where are the SVFIG folks?
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: Ed
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Ed
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Ed
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: Ed
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: William James
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Writing, Coding, and Professionals (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Ed
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Ed
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: Ed
• Writing, Coding, and Professionals (was Re: A Brief Look at History)
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Marc Olschok
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Marc Olschok
• Re: Writing Many New Versions of Forth (was Re: part 21 . . . )
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Writing Many New Versions of Forth (was Re: part 21 . . . )
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: William James
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Open Firmware (was: part 21 asserts ...)
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Open Firmware (was: part 21 asserts ...)
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Open Firmware (was: part 21 asserts ...)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• c-version, was Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Ed
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Ed
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Ed
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Ed
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: Ed
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: William James
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: William James
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: William James
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Marc Olschok
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: William James
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Is there a hole in the SEARCH wordset?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Is this workable? .warning .error
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Is there a hole in the SEARCH wordset?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Is there a hole in the SEARCH wordset?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Is this workable? .warning .error
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• An example of Forth failure to thrive. Was: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Is this workable? .warning .error
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: FSL array indexing
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Is this workable? .warning .error
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Is this workable? .warning .error
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Stan Katz
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: OT: Humour
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: Miser's CASE
  • From: m_l_g3
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: Is this workable? .warning .error
  • From: m_l_g3
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: FSL array indexing
  • From: m_l_g3
• Re: Is there a hole in the SEARCH wordset?
  • From: m_l_g3
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: GForth 6.2 built on Mac Xcode troubles
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: Is this workable? .warning .error
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Is there a hole in the SEARCH wordset?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Is this workable? .warning .error
  • From: m_l_g3
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Is there a hole in the SEARCH wordset?
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Cross compiler question
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Is there a hole in the SEARCH wordset?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: SOD64 - a 64bit Stack Oriented Design Processor
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Is there a hole in the SEARCH wordset?
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: A Brief Look at History
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: William James
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: William James
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• A Brief Look at History (Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lispbe better in non small mem?)
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• A Change of Pace (was Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?)
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: GForth 6.2 built on Mac Xcode troubles
  • From: brian . fox
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Ed
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Is there a hole in the SEARCH wordset?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Is there a hole in the SEARCH wordset?
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Marc Olschok
• Re: SOD64 - a 64bit Stack Oriented Design Processor
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Is there a hole in the SEARCH wordset?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: gavino
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: GForth 6.2 built on Mac Xcode troubles
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: SOD64 - a 64bit Stack Oriented Design Processor
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Macros etc Was: DISFAVORED
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Macros etc Was: DISFAVORED
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• FSL auxiliary files: proposed reorganization of words
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: John Doty
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: GForth 6.2 built on Mac Xcode troubles
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: GForth 6.2 built on Mac Xcode troubles
  • From: brian . fox
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: BETWEEN
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: GForth 6.2 built on Mac Xcode troubles
  • From: John Doty
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• GForth 6.2 built on Mac Xcode troubles
  • From: brian . fox
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: John Doty
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: gavino
• Re: INLINE
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Is this workable? .warning .error
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• BETWEEN
  • From: Ed
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: INLINE
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: INLINE
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: INLINE
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: SOD64 - a 64bit Stack Oriented Design Processor
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Macros etc Was: DISFAVORED
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: SOD64 - a 64bit Stack Oriented Design Processor
  • From: Charlie Springer
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Macros etc Was: DISFAVORED
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: FSL array indexing
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: INLINE
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: Shareable Code
  • From: Robert Miller
• Re: Shareable Code
  • From: Robert Miller
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Frank Buss
• Re: Macros etc Was: DISFAVORED
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Shareable Code
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: INLINE (was: FSL array indexing)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Shareable Code
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: SOD64 - a 64bit Stack Oriented Design Processor
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Frank Buss
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Duke Normandin
• The detail functions about the intel pentium processor.....
  • From: lisa
• Re: OT: DNA - a different kind of programming - (2 bit word length)
  • From: none
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: thomas . mertes
• INLINE (was: FSL array indexing)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: gavino
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: gavino
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: gavino
• Re: Forth as Assembly Language
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: FSL array indexing
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: Shareable Code
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Macros etc Was: DISFAVORED
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Shareable Code
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Macros etc Was: DISFAVORED
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: FSL array indexing
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Shareable Code
  • From: John Doty
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: John Doty
• Re: FSL array indexing
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Shareable Code
  • From: Robert Miller
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: SOD64 - a 64bit Stack Oriented Design Processor
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: John Doty
• Re: FSL array indexing
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Forth as Assembly Language
  • From: John Doty
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: John Doty
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Shareable Code
  • From: John Doty
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: John Doty
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Disfavoured words (Re: name for 3 PICK finally?)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Shareable Code
  • From: Robert Miller
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• FSL array indexing
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Programming language popularity
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Late vs. early binding Was: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Ian Osgood
• SOD64 - a 64bit Stack Oriented Design Processor
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: Stephan Becher
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Late vs. early binding Was: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be
  • From: kenney
• Miser's CASE
  • From: Ed
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Josh Grams
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bill
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: winston19842005
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: winston19842005
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• DISFAVORED Was: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Does forth have infix operators with priority and associativity?
  • From: thomas . mertes
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Excellent opportunity for Software testers
  • From: jeromeejohnpdkt
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: starting forth ch4 problem 5
  • From: John Doty
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: How to create an array
  • From: Coos Haak
• How to create an array
  • From: Duke Normandin
• Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
  • From: gavino
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: starting forth ch4 problem 5
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• does forth in silicon have anything to do with David May/transputers?
  • From: gavino
• Re: starting forth ch4 problem 5
  • From: gavino
• Re: starting forth ch4 problem 5
  • From: Mikael Nordman
• Re: starting forth ch4 problem 5
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: m_l_g3
• Re: starting forth ch4 problem 5
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: starting forth ch4 problem 5
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: starting forth ch4 problem 5
  • From: Ian Osgood
• starting forth ch4 problem 5
  • From: gavino
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: m_l_g3
• Re: macros, code as data
  • From: m_l_g3
• name for 3 PICK finally?
  • From: m_l_g3
• Re: macros, code as data
  • From: m_l_g3
• Re: FORTH use in Toys
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: 4FreeImage has been updated
  • From: Jos van de Ven
• Re: 4FreeImage has been updated
  • From: Bruno Gauthier
• Re: 4FreeImage has been updated
  • From: Jos van de Ven
• Re: FORTH use in Toys
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Forth as Assembly Language
  • From: Guy Macon
• Re: FORTH use in Toys
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: macros, code as data
  • From: gavino
• Unexpected portability.
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: macros, code as data
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Forth as Assembly Language
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: Forth as Assembly Language
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: Forth as Assembly Language (Was Re: FORTH levels)
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: macros, code as data
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: macros, code as data
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• macros, code as data
  • From: gavino
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Visibility inside a colon definition
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: MIDForth
  • From: jacko
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: sbi82
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: sbi82
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Announcing ffl release 0.6.0
  • From: gavino
• Announcing ffl release 0.6.0
  • From: Dick van Oudheusden
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: sbi82
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: sbi82
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Intellasys Site Has Changed!
  • From: Jecel
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Visibility inside a colon definition
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: sbi82
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: d>f and f>d missing in ficl and order for double cells?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Visibility inside a colon definition
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: d>f and f>d missing in ficl and order for double cells?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Intellasys Site Has Changed!
  • From: Charlie Springer
• Re: Intellasys Site Has Changed!
  • From: Charlie Springer
• Maybe a newbie question..
  • From: sbi82
• Re: d>f and f>d missing in ficl and order for double cells?
  • From: Frank Buss
• Re: Forth Interest Group website down?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Visibility inside a colon definition
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Visibility inside a colon definition
  • From: Ed
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: FORTH levels
  • From: John Doty
• Re: d>f and f>d missing in ficl and order for double cells?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• 128 by 64 unsigned division
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: d>f and f>d missing in ficl and order for double cells?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Forth Interest Group website down?
  • From: Jordan Henderson
• d>f and f>d missing in ficl and order for double cells?
  • From: Frank Buss
• Re: MIDForth
  • From: jacko
• Re: Visibility inside a colon definition
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Visibility inside a colon definition
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Visibility inside a colon definition
  • From: Ed
• Re: Forth Testing Tools?
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: Forth Testing Tools?
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: Visibility inside a colon definition
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Visibility inside a colon definition
  • From: Ed
• Re: Forth Interest Group website down?
  • From: Josh Grams
• Forth Interest Group website down?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Forth Testing Tools?
  • From: Ed
• What is the Comus for ...? [OPTIONAL]
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: confusing bit in ch4 of starting forth
  • From: gavino
• Re: confusing bit in ch4 of starting forth
  • From: Jonah Thomas