Re: interesting question
- From: Charlie Springer <RAM@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 20:21:46 -0800
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 12:51:47 -0800, Marcel Hendrix wrote
(in article <76043321123560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
Is there a faster solution without requiring infinite memory for any
arbitrary value of n?
Oh, these intertwined questions...
First of, any practical `arbitrary' value in this case has less than 32 bits.
If the practical value fits in 32-bits, the amount of memory needed is not
infinite, and would run on existing PCs with 8 GBytes of RAM.
Didn't Dykstra or Hoare prove that any recursion can be performed more
efficiently with a loop?
-- Charlie Springer
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: interesting question
- From: John Passaniti
- Re: interesting question
- From: Marcel Hendrix
- Re: interesting question
- From: Andrew Haley
- Re: interesting question
- References:
- Re: interesting question
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: interesting question
- From: Marcel Hendrix
- Re: interesting question
- Prev by Date: Re: X-Prize Lunar Lander Challenge
- Next by Date: Re: ANN: Starting Forth on-line
- Previous by thread: Re: interesting question
- Next by thread: Re: interesting question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|