comp.lang.forth

• Thread Index

---

• gforth dos/win
  • From: Bill
• Re: Just making sure I can post.
  • From: Frank Buss
• Just making sure I can post.
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: R4 new version
  • From: Tarkin
• Re: 4p-1.5-wip with just in time compilation
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: 4p-1.5-wip with just in time compilation
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: 4p-1.5-wip with just in time compilation
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: What were "shadow blocks"?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: What were "shadow blocks"?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: 4p-1.5-wip with just in time compilation
  • From: helmwo
• Re: What were "shadow blocks"?
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: RFD: Reworking of TO (Version 3)
  • From: helmwo
• Re: 4p-1.5-wip with just in time compilation
  • From: helmwo
• Re: What were "shadow blocks"?
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: What were "shadow blocks"?
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: 4p-1.5-wip with just in time compilation
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: 4p-1.5-wip with just in time compilation
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: What were "shadow blocks"?
  • From: werty
• You ppl are sooo far behind in programming !
  • From: werty
• Re: 4p-1.5-wip with just in time compilation
  • From: werty
• Re: 4p-1.5-wip with just in time compilation
  • From: werty
• 4p-1.5-wip with just in time compilation
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: RFD: Reworking of TO (Version 3)
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: win32forth allocate
  • From: dbu
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: slava@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: What were "shadow blocks"?
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: What were "shadow blocks"?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RFD: Reworking of TO (Version 3)
  • From: helmwo
• Re: win32forth allocate
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RFD: Reworking of TO (Version 3)
  • From: helmwo
• Re: win32forth allocate
  • From: Frank
• Re: RFD: Reworking of TO (Version 3)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: dreamwafer
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: dreamwafer
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: dreamwafer
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: dreamwafer
• Re: What were "shadow blocks"?
  • From: astrobe
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RFD: Reworking of TO (Version 3)
  • From: m_l_g3
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: m_l_g3
• Re: What were "shadow blocks"?
  • From: m_l_g3
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: R4 new version
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: dreamwafer
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: R4 new version
  • From: Tarkin
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: What were "shadow blocks"?
  • From: jch
• Re: win32forth allocate
  • From: Bill
• R4 new version
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: What were "shadow blocks"?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• What were "shadow blocks"?
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Announcement: Axiom, a Forth Based Universal Game Programming System
  • From: dreamwafer
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: news.la.sbcglobal.net
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: win32forth allocate
  • From: Bruno Gauthier
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• win32forth allocate
  • From: Bill
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: fractal terrain in forth?
  • From: macoln
• Re: fractal terrain in forth?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• automated FSL tests
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• fractal terrain in forth?
  • From: macoln
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: spin lock
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• spin lock
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Current Standings: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: DFFS open source
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: EuroForth 2007 Call for Participation
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: DFFS open source
  • From: expandafter
• EuroForth 2007 Call for Participation
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: DFFS open source
  • From: expandafter
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Ed
• BSD indi processor
  • From: jacko
• Re: DFFS open source
  • From: expandafter
• Re: DFFS open source
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Sounds familiar
  • From: foxchip
• Re: DFFS open source
  • From: Frank
• Re: Sounds familiar
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Sounds familiar
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Sounds familiar
  • From: foxchip
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Sounds familiar
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Sounds familiar
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Sounds familiar
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Ed
• Re: Sounds familiar
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: OPEN-FILE and CREATE-FILE
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: OPEN-FILE and CREATE-FILE (was: Spreadsheet available)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Sounds familiar
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Sounds familiar
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Clever Monkey
• Re: MI5 Persecution: Fitted up 26/4/96 (904)
  • From: Charlie Springer
• Re: MI5 Persecution: Fitted up 26/4/96 (904)
  • From: Charlie Springer
• Re: OPEN-FILE and CREATE-FILE
  • From: Wolfgang Allinger
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Coos Haak
• DFFS open source
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: OPEN-FILE and CREATE-FILE
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OPEN-FILE and CREATE-FILE (was: Spreadsheet available)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OPEN-FILE and CREATE-FILE (was: Spreadsheet available)
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Anton Ertl
• OPEN-FILE and CREATE-FILE (was: Spreadsheet available)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: expandafter
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OPEN-FILE and CREATE-FILE
  • From: Wolfgang Allinger
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: expandafter
• Re: Sounds familiar
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Sounds familiar
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Sounds familiar
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: William James
• Re: Sounds familiar
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: email failure for recipient Anton Ertl
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: expandafter
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Sounds familiar
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: expandafter
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: expandafter
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• RFD: Reworking of TO (Version 3)
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: expandafter
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: email failure for recipient Anton Ertl
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: email failure for recipient Anton Ertl
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: expandafter
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: expandafter
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: expandafter
• Re: email failure for recipient Anton Ertl
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• email failure for recipient Anton Ertl
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: expandafter
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: expandafter
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: expandafter
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: A word for to recognize comatiblity.
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: forth source organization
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Gerry
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: John Doty
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Gerry
• Re: forth source organization
  • From: mmihai
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: forth source organization
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: forth source organization
  • From: mmihai
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: forth source organization
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: forth source organization
  • From: mmihai
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: expandafter
• Re: Spreadsheet available
  • From: John Passaniti
• Spreadsheet available
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: forth source organization
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: forth source organization
  • From: mmihai
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: Forth CPU's WHEN?????
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: kenney
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: kenney
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Gerry
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Forth200x: Serious design flaw in deferred words proposal.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: werty
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Forth CPU's WHEN?????
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: kenney
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: forth source organization
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: forth source organization
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: forth source organization
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Forth CPU's WHEN?????
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Forth CPU's WHEN?????
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: slava@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: My First Forth Sale
  • From: Charlie Springer
• Re: ANN: kForth 1.4.1 for Linux (x86)
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: spam
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: helmwo
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: John Passaniti
• CfV: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: forth databases
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: helmwo
• Re: forth source organization
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: forth databases
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• forth source organization
  • From: mmihai
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: forth databases
  • From: Ron Aaron
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: chuck@xxxxxxx
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset
  • From: Peter Fälth
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Peter Fälth
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Peter Fälth
• Re: Fastest MacIntel Forth?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: A word for to recognize comatiblity.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: A word for to recognize comatiblity.
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Gerry
• Re: New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: forth databases
  • From: jim
• Re: A word for to recognize comatiblity.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: spam
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: A word for to recognize comatiblity.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Peter Fälth
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset
  • From: Peter Fälth
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Dusting off an old JVM discussion
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: A word for to recognize comatiblity.
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Gerry
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: gavino
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: jcomeau_ictx
• gforth webserver, why isn't forth used all over ecommerce?
  • From: gavino
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: Dusting off an old JVM discussion
  • From: xgeoff
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: Dusting off an old JVM discussion
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: Dusting off an old JVM discussion
  • From: brian . fox
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: John Doty
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: John Doty
• Dusting off an old JVM discussion
  • From: xgeoff
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: John Doty
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Case Sensitivity) (was RfD: Number Prefixes)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: A word for to recognize comatiblity.
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: A word for to recognize comatiblity.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Case Sensitivity) (was RfD: Number Prefixes)
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: John Doty
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• New version of John Hayes' tester
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: A word for to recognize comatiblity.
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: jcomeau_ictx
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: jcomeau_ictx
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: jcomeau_ictx
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: John Doty
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: forth databases
  • From: gavino
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: forth databases
  • From: jim
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: A word for to recognize comatiblity.
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• 2nd RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Case Sensitivity) (was RfD: Number Prefixes)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: compiling forth
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: A word for to recognize comatiblity.
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: division algorithm
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• division algorithm
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: spam
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Peter Fälth
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Case Sensitivity) (was RfD: Number Prefixes)
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: A word for to recognize comatiblity.
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Ed
• Re: A word for to recognize comatiblity.
  • From: Ron Aaron
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: John Passaniti
• A word for to recognize comatiblity.
  • From: helmwo
• Tiny OS based on byte-code interpreter
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Large characters in ANS Forth
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Large characters in ANS Forth
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• RfD: Escaped Strings version 4
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Gerry
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• forth databases
  • From: gavino
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: compiling forth
  • From: foxchip
• Re: Bootstrapping Forth on JVM, .NET CLR, etc.
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: Bootstrapping Forth on JVM, .NET CLR, etc.
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: compiling forth
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: compiling forth
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: number parsing hooks (was: RfD: Number Prefixes)
  • From: m_l_g3
• Re: Bill Stewart passes on
  • From: Clever Monkey
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: compiling forth
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jorge Acereda
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Escaped Strings
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: Vintage Computers
  • From: Cesar Rabak
• Re: Vintage Computers
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Bill Stewart passes on
  • From: RMDumse
• Re: compiling forth
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• compiling forth
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Bootstrapping Forth on JVM, .NET CLR, etc.
  • From: joel reymont
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Gerry
• Bootstrapping Forth on JVM, .NET CLR, etc.
  • From: joel reymont
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: werty
• OT: midi file conversion
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: Bill Stewart passes on
  • From: RMDumse
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Gerry
• Re: Bill Stewart passes on
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: number parsing hooks
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: number parsing hooks (was: RfD: Number Prefixes)
  • From: helmwo
• Re: number parsing hooks (was: RfD: Number Prefixes)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: number parsing hooks (was: RfD: Number Prefixes)
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: number parsing hooks (was: RfD: Number Prefixes)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: number parsing hooks (was: RfD: Number Prefixes)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Bill Stewart passes on
  • From: Frank Buss
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Bill Stewart passes on
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• number parsing hooks (was: RfD: Number Prefixes)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Bill Stewart passes on
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Ed
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• ANN: kForth 1.4.1 for Linux (x86)
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Bill Stewart passes on
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Bill Stewart passes on
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: Bill Stewart passes on
  • From: RMDumse
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• Re: RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: helmwo
• RfD: Number Prefixes
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: 2nd RfD: Directories
  • From: Ruvim Pinka
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: My First Forth Sale
  • From: peterl
• Re: Being Driven Crazy
  • From: Frank Buss
• Re: Being Driven Crazy
  • From: Tarkin
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Bill Stewart passes on
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: jcomeau_ictx
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Bill Stewart passes on
  • From: RMDumse
• Bill Stewart passes on
  • From: RMDumse
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: OT. Just plain OT
  • From: Jonah Thomas
• Re: OT. Just plain OT
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: OT. Just plain OT
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Being Driven Crazy
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: OT. Just plain OT
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• OT. Just plain OT
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: number prefix survey, 2nd round
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Being Driven Crazy
  • From: cyclintom
• Re: number prefix survey, 2nd round
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Fastest MacIntel Forth?
  • From: Mike Hore
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: enum in Forth
  • From: Jeff M.
• enum in Forth
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: My First Forth Sale
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: My First Forth Sale
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: number prefix survey, 2nd round
  • From: Peter Fälth
• Re: My First Forth Sale
  • From: winston19842005
• Re: My First Forth Sale
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: My First Forth Sale
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Caltech Forth Manual
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: My First Forth Sale
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: The Big Red Abort Button
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: My First Forth Sale
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: My First Forth Sale
  • From: Jason Damisch
• Re: My First Forth Sale
  • From: Jason Damisch

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(18)